Talk:Nikhil Kamath

Manipulations of the information in this page
This page seems to be curated with the goal of being laudatory rather than factual, for example the latest removal of a section that had solid sources (multiple media and tweets) with the following contributions https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikhil_Kamath&diff=1163123739&oldid=1163123686 does not seems justified. 94.107.241.66 (talk) 18:12, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear, hope you are well. Firstly, when chess controversy was added to the page (link), you added tweets to support the claims. Unfortunately, we can not use self-published tweets that involves claims about events directly related to the source as per WP:TWITTER. Secondly, while writing such controversies ideally one should add most reliable sources to support the claim. The list is here: Reliable sources/Perennial sources.
 * I needed more time to learn about the controversy hence when I reverted your edit last time I did not improvise it further. However, now I have added more reliable sources as citations and edited the tone to make it sound more encyclopaedic. Thanks. Himalayan7914 (talk) 04:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Himalayan7914 (talk) 15:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC) I have added a controversy related to the subject with multiple reliable sources then how can this article be nominated under G11? I think this nomination is harsh and unfair.

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Himalayan7914 (talk) 15:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC) The article has more than 30 sources which are considered as reliable at Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources Additionally the subject is extensively covered by Indian National Media - Economic Times, Times of India, Indian Express, The Hindu, NDTV, Forbes, Business Today and also by some International Media - Aljazeera, Bloomberg. All the aforementioned media are considered as most reliable in Wikipedia. Then how come the article is nominated under A7? Again bit harsh and unfair.

Hi sir meeru chese eee sahayam pedha prajakaku andhela cheyandi sir 2409:40F0:300C:CBFF:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 07:47, 8 June 2024 (UTC)