Talk:Nikola Tesla/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: StudiesWorld (talk · contribs) 11:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Review
 <li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

Discussion

 * I am concerned that the nominator is a relatively inexperienced editor who, judging by his edit summary, has little idea of GA requirements and is not one of the main contributors to the article. Main contributors are supposed to be consulted before nominating according to the GA instructions (pinging User:MrX and User:Fountains of Bryn Mawr).
 * This article is especially problematic in that it has previously been subject to numerous edit wars (over Tesla's nationality for instance), insertion of pseudo-scientific poorly referenced or unreferenced claims about Tesla's abilities and inventions, and all kinds of conspiracy theories. In short, the name of Tesla has entered the realm of urban myth and it is very hard to keep this kind of thing out.  It would be wise to consult the regular editors to check whether, in their opinion, there are any lingering issues of this sort.  Also, someone needs to be willing to address any issues raised, the last GA simply died through lack of interest. <b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b><b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b> 23:46, 10 July 2015 (UTC)