Talk:Nilgiri-class frigate (2019)

Assessment
This article has been automatically assessed for WP:SHIPS as stub-class because there is a stub template on the article page. H aus  Talk  22:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. -- — Cactus Writer |   needles  07:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

possible disruption
can anyone please confirm if this is correct or not. regards --  Ð ℬig XЯaɣ   03:37, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Project 17A-class frigate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160131152249/http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1650094.html to http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1650094.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160131152249/http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1650094.html to http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1650094.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Project 17A-class frigate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150218093318/http://www.forceindia.net/NovFeatureReport7.aspx to http://www.forceindia.net/NovFeatureReport7.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

127mm vs 76mm main gun
Hi, thanks for the latest updates on the specifications of the ship. I do have a concern on the main gun of the ship. I was the one who added the 127mm main gun from OTO Melara based on the reference here. This is further cemented indirectly by the the another release recently which states thirteen 127mm main gun from BAE are being procured. Now the second source does not clearly state that are being procured for Project 17A but that seems to be the case since only 4 Visakhapatnam-class destroyer are being built. But the recent Janes source states that the gun is going to be 76mm from OTO Melara. This is essentially based on the specifications MDL had released during the recent DEFEXPO. This can be further confirmed by photos of the ship specifications at the MDL booth (obviously they are WP:SPS and not permissible). My analysis of the situation is that the ship will carry a 127mm gun based on the recent clearance from the DAC. MDL had to choose a gun upfront since they were not sure which one to choose and thus went ahead with the 76mm gun during the Expo. Obviously all of this is WP:OR. I agree with your current decision of keeping the 127mm gun in the infobox. This is more to get a discussion going since we have conflicting sources. Do you have any thoughts on this? Thanks. Adamgerber80 (talk) 04:53, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think that it is much of a concern as both the gun choices that we currently have in reliable sources, be it Oto Melara 127 mm or 76 mm, constitute outdated information anyway. When we do get a reliable source for choice of BAE Mk 45 as the main gun, the article can be updated to reflect it. —Gazoth (talk) 11:59, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Let's leave the 127mm up there for now. We can update it once we have WP:RS for BAE Mk 45. Adamgerber80 (talk) 14:24, 28 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The BAE Mk 45 gun had indeed been selected for Nilgiri class and Vishakapatnam class, however, plans have since changed


 * The BAE Mk 45 has been canceled on basis of cost, and a Make in India 76 mm gun is to be used until a larger plan for 127 mm guns is identified.


 * Speculatively, it might be the below gun ; however no specific news on the use of this gun for the Nilgiri class and Vishakapatnam class and thus it would be unjustified to reference it.


 * I would recommend going with an unlisted make of 76 mm gun for now in the info box


 * Barath s (talk) 11:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Why not just state what we know so far? (and is sourced) In the infobox, put "see Design section", then in the design section, add the info we have so far; that initially a 76mm gun was part of the design, that was later changed to a 127mm gun, but that may not be the case anymore and a final decision has not yet been made. The class is new, so it's not out of the ordinary to include info about varying possibilities and pending decisions, as long as it's sourced of course. (jmho) -  wolf  17:24, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Content removal
I have made this edit due to the following reasons,
 * 1) Frigate under construction is not damaged
 * 2) Frigate construction is not affected by the incident (stated in the content itself)
 * 3) Repairing or replacing a crane in the shipyard is irrelevant information on this article about P-17A frigate, which could be added to the shipbuilder's article page
 * 4) WP:NOTNP —FoxtAl (talk) 17:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Response towards removal of content
Hi User:FoxtAl, I understand that you have reverted my contributions on the Nilgiri-class frigate (2019), most specifically its "2017 accident" sub-section. I find your reasons for the removal of the content to be partially objectionable for the following reasons -


 * I specifically mentioned that the vessels under construction are not damaged.
 * The accident imparted a tremendous delay to the class' construction timeline, and is therefore, a notable part of the class' history. I also mentioned the steps that the shipyard took to circumvent the problem. The accident was related to the class, and also imparted specific consequences on its construction - which merits attention on a Wiki page.

I agree to the fact that the replacement of the crane may not be directly related to the class' construction, and I will add it to shipyard's Wiki page.

Thank you for your suggestion.
 * 1) WP:NOTNP —Kishore Editing (User talk:Kishore Editing) 8:57, 6 May 2022 (ITC)

VLS section and other irrelevant topics
Recently, the has been making many uncalled for and irrelevant edits specially in this page. Not only this, he keeps on re-reverting the changes. An unnecessary section of comparison has been made with Shivalik. These are different ships of different time-frame, of course there's going to be plethora of changes which doesn't needs to be mentioned since a user can digest these changes looking at the specification in each page.

So on the topic of VLS
 * P-17A frigates utilize vertical launching system (VLS) ...

Shivaliks has VLS for Brahmos, Klub and Barak-1. I am not sure why he is adamant on suggesting that Shivalik doesn't have VLS for launching missiles. Please do not redo the mistakes again and again. I have no issues with valid points being made but adding inane topics and justifying them to be true is not right. Just because a page has mentioned something wrong doesn't mean we have to be meek spectator, use commons sense before editing rather than getting stuck at a single topic. Shashpant (talk) 08:51, 23 August 2022 (UTC)!

Request help - Mahendragiri
I have added the launch of Mahendragiri. But in the table, Mahendragiri went in the middle. It was the 7th and last ship launched on 1 September 2023. I could not do the table. Request editors to correct the mistake. I could not also revert my edit. Davidindia Davidindia (talk) 14:13, 1 September 2023 (UTC)