Talk:Nilsemigroup

Nilpotent semigroup
can you please explain why you did remove the name «nilpotent semigroup» ? That's the word used by Pin's textbook. And unless you claim it's not a valid reference, then this name seems as legit as nilsemigroup. In particular your description «Typo/general fixes, replaced: archimedian → Archimedean, fixing a red link.» is really misleading. Removing one of the alternative names of the object is not a minor modification. Anyway, I add this name back. Arthur MILCHIOR (talk) 14:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * My edit on 18 October [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nilsemigroup&type=revision&diff=864597461&oldid=849614250 did this], changing the red link Archimedean into the blue link Archimedean. The next change was a month later when an anonymous editor [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nilsemigroup&type=revision&diff=869395692&oldid=864597461 rewrote the first sentence]. -- John of Reading (talk) 14:43, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I beg your pardon. You are totally right and I don't know why I thought it was your edit. I'd love to ask anonymous user the same question, but I guess it's going to be impossible. Arthur MILCHIOR (talk) 14:56, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem! It's just possible that the IP may find this conversation. I'll post on the IPs talk page. -- John of Reading (talk) 15:04, 2 December 2018 (UTC)