Talk:Nimrod (computer)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Indrian (talk · contribs) 02:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm definitely seeing a pattern here. Comments to follow. Indrian (talk) 02:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

This article is in excellent shape. I made a small number of grammar tweaks, leaving just one minor issue (can't make this process too easy ;). In the sentence "The majority of the volume was taken up by vacuum tubes and the lightbulbs that displayed the state of the game, with the actual computer taking up no more than two percent of the total machine," what is the two percent referring to? Is it volume, which is sorta implied but not explicitly stated, or weight, or something else? If the source does not say, then maybe this needs to be fudged a little bit. I'll go ahead and put this while this minor point is addressed. Indrian (talk) 20:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * It was volume, it did explicitly say. Done. Thanks so much for reviewing! Unless you want to hit the cathode ray tube amusement device GAN (aka the "not a video game" article) there's going to be a break for a while; I haven't even started on Tennis for Two or any of the others yet. -- Pres N  21:08, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Well let's get this sucker promoted then. Its been a pleasure working with you on these articles.  I may give the Cathode-ray Tube Amusement Device a go since no one else is.  Otherwise, I look forward to your future efforts. Indrian (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2016 (UTC)