Talk:Nina Gamble Kennedy

Untitled
Can you please explain to me what you mean by "neutral point of view." All of the details in the article are factual and true, and have been well vetted. Nina07011960 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:59, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Well vetted by whom? Largoplazo (talk) 02:46, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

If you Google the subject, you will find all the material there online. Nina07011960 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC) Please explain what is meant by "neutral point of view," and give specific examples of what should be removed. Nina07011960 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Please read the explanation at WP:NPOV, as well as the commentary at WP:COI, two links that have already been supplied to you precisely through means of the tag you removed, and one of them as well on your talk page, if you haven't already read them. "Neutral" isn't a synonym for "true". And this isn't a matter of you soliciting requests for edits. It's a matter of someone else with no connection to you reviewing it and, if appropriate, editing it, and then removing the COI tag upon being satisfied that there is nothing further in the article posing any concern. Largoplazo (talk) 01:11, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

So how am I supposed to find "someone else with no connection to [me]" to read the article? Several days went by and no one responded to my question. The instructions stated that if too much time went by with no response, to delete it. Nina07011960 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, you're misunderstanding. This isn't a personal assignment. The tag lets people referring to the article know that it has this outstanding issue, just as other tags let them know that an article has no reliable sources, or is an orphan, or hasn't been categorized yet, or needs some copyediting. Tags also place articles in maintenance categories, as this one places this article in a subcategory of Category:Wikipedia articles with possible conflicts of interest, which people interested in resolving COI issues around the site can browse to identify articles needing attention.
 * I'm not sure what instruction you're seeing, but see Template:COI, which states "This tag may be removed by editors who do not have a conflict of interest after the problem is resolved, if the problem is not explained on the article's talk page, and/or if no current attempts to resolve the problem can be found." It should be clear that the person who has a COI isn't an appropriate person to be evaluating an article for evidence of influence from a COI. Largoplazo (talk) 02:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

==== Suggestion ==== Thank you for this article! I've learned a lot about Nina Gamble Kennedy from the article and I really hope you do add to it more! If I were to suggest something, I would say that perhaps it would be helpful to readers if you were to add more information regarding the recordings, works and films. If you can find any information regarding the making of these things, or anything particularly interesting that occurred when recording, writing or filming! She seems like such an interesting person already from what you have written, and it seems that if you could add more in these sections ("Recordings", "Works" and "Films") this could perhaps be useful to readers! Thanks! Cellolizardschool (talk) 01:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


 * You can add them. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 03:35, 4 November 2020 (UTC)