Talk:Nisko Plan

The Bits About Browning
The stuff at the end of this article seems a little too close to weighing in on the whole "Functionalism versus Intentionalism" debate and - correct me if I'm wrong - but isn't that something with which Wikipedia shouldn't choose sides? It literally just says "Most historians....MAINSTREAM historians" and that seems a little ridiculous, considering it's such a huge schism within the serious historiography of the holocaust, a schism in which both schools of thought conceded to the other just to get some sort of consensus. Basically saying "yeah, both sides have their merits and their evidence." That hardly seems like MOST HISTORIANS disagree with Browning. (Additionally, the source the suspect statement cites is none other than Browning themself, maybe Browning's just the most humble person around, or maybe those were just ham-fisted in because whomever wrote those jabs wanted to choose sides and did so around the already-extant sources). As you can tell, I have picked a side - the side that doesn't think wikipedia should pick a side in an on-going scholarly debate which doesn't seem to be meeting its conclusion anytime soon. 2601:87:4400:AF2:B17D:88BD:BBE9:6B58 (talk) 00:42, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Untitled
also known as Nisko - Nisko or not?Xx236 (talk) 13:07, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Christopher Browning is not a revisionist historian and the Holocaust was not agreed on at the Wannsee conference. I suspect that more is wrong with the article, but I'm not an expert on the subject. 83.77.26.190 (talk) 22:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Agree absolutely on both the above points and have removed the word revisionist, which was highly misleading in the context. Browning's claim that the SS experimented with various possible solutions is not revisionist. Norvo (talk) 13:49, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Another Error

 * the intentionalist/functionalist historiography debate which historian Christopher Browning has tried to initiate

The debate on intentionalism/functionalism (and these terms) goes back to 1980 or earlier. It was not 'initiated' by Christopher Browning. Norvo (talk) 01:08, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * There's someone who's been editing this article that's dancing around the ole' F vs I debate but that's obviously biased in their portrayal. Now it says "MOST HISTORIANS" disagree with Browning and whenever I see a "MOST HISTORIANS/MAINSTREAM HISTORIANS" statement my eyes roll so fast it gives my brain whiplash. You might be able to get away with that when countering Climate Change deniers but not this particular debate which is still very much alive and contentious. (If it weren't, I wouldn't be complaining about the obvious bias right now.) 2601:87:4400:AF2:B17D:88BD:BBE9:6B58 (talk) 00:42, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

geographically unclear
(mostly)because the last paragraph of the first piece in the article is unsourced it is giving a few wrong impressions, at first because the suggestion is lublin and nisko are neigbouring towns, for that reason it is not obvious if the german wiki is unclear about the prepared use of the facility, or if this article refers to a, the and many burggraben projects, possibly only in the area of lublin, perhaps it is confusing the burggraben project with the nisko plan?62.195.7.176 (talk) 08:48, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Article name
Per Article titles, the town of Nisko – although named in the SS planning stage of the so-called Nisko-Aktion for the creation of Judenreservaten or Judenreservat in occupied Poland – was (and still is) insignificant in terms of size in comparison to the provincial capital of Lublin in Poland, former location of the Lublin Ghetto and the massive Majdanek concentration camp system of subcamps. This article is not about the plan per se, but about its successful implementation in the form of the Lublin Reservation (Browning) a.k.a. Lublin-Reservat (Gutman, Jäckel, Longerich, Schoeps) which best identifies the actual subject of this article.
 * "Nisko Plan" search in Google Books: 296 results.
 * "Lublin Plan" search in Google Books 367 results.
 * "Lublin Reservation" search in Google Books 1,110 results.
 * Renamed accordingly. Thanks,  Poeticbent  talk 15:28, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lublin Reservation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160208215116/http://www.sztetl.org.pl/en/selectcity/ to http://www.sztetl.org.pl/en/selectcity/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Split article?
The article seems like it's about two different topics: 1) the Nisko Plan 2) the Holocaust in the Lublin District in general, after the Nisko Plan was abandoned. How do editors feel about a split? buidhe 02:22, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If there are no objections I may start working on this soon. Will draft at Draft:Nisko Plan and Draft:The Holocaust in the Lublin District. buidhe 18:13, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:24, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Krychów forced labour camp 1940 (Krowie Bagno).jpg