Talk:Nival (company)/Archive 1

Allods Online
I'm wondering if anyone would like to help make an article for this game? Obviously it's not released yet so I'll probably work on my sandbox for it before releasing it as a page but I thought it deserved an article, it's already won awards apparently and it looks like a promising MMO. Earisu &hearts; | Talk 07:24, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Nival Group
Just for info.

Nival Group = Nival Interactive + Astrum Nival + Nival Network

Nival Interactive:
 * Heroes of Might and Magic V, Blitzkrieg (video game), Silent Storm, Etherlords series, Rage of Mages.

Astrum Nival:
 * Allods Online

Nival Network:
 * ZZima.com social network, Prime World game —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Porai-Koshits (talk • contribs) 09:30, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Nival got hacked last year. Encyclopedic to include?
Hi, just now I came across this news saying that this company server has been hacked:

Teen ‘Cyber Anakin’ hacker wants revenge on Russia after the MH17 crash

At start I'm thinking to include the event straight away but after checking the edit histories the edit sounds like a contentious one, so I bring all you here to discuss about this: Is it encyclopedic to include the said hacking into here?

Pavel Novikov (talk) 07:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * While there was apparently a real breach (see the Troy Hunt ref) as far as I can see there's no indication that anyone really noticed until CA contacted Motherboard with his brag. (The only other reporting points back to Motherboard). I wouldn't put it in myself; but I'd not remove it if you added it - as long as it's low-key. Snori (talk) 08:49, 21 July 2017 (UTC)


 * I agree with Snori. Arigatous (talk) 10:08, 21 July 2017 (UTC)


 * It has come to my attention that the edit we're talking about originates from a blocked user. However I don't think we should exclude encyclopedic and helpful additions simply because it's from blocked-niks. Cc: Pavel Novikov (talk) 08:15, 22 July 2017 (UTC)


 * This had previously been closed per WP:DENY but a block-evading IP had reopened it and a comment was made by another user. — MRD 20  14  13:42, 22 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Acting upon my wife's advice that this proposed edit is too contentious which may invite more problems I have to do a U-turn and withdraw the proposal. If anyone wish to debate further they're free to override my closure. Pavel Novikov (talk) 13:59, 22 July 2017 (UTC)