Talk:Nixie (drone)

This article describes an invention that I believe has a potential to change perception of drones and is a great case for civilian use of drones. ~Zina~ (talk) 08:00, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Following discussions with user User:DGG, the article has been improved. Moreover, winning the Intel competition was a condition for this article to meet notability requirements, which is now met. I will do my best to further improve this article, but invite you the person reading it to contribute to either discussion or the article itself. ~Zina~ (talk) 08:00, 4 November 2014 (UTC)


 * It's considered a rather bold thing to move one's own article out of draft space, rather than ask for review, but it isn't prohibited. I am not going to list it again for deletion, but I suggest that the article can be improved by some condensations about the details of the various roles of the developers. This is too much detail for the importance to presently support. I started. with one sentence. It helps to emove everything that might possible reflect a conflict or interest.  DGG ( talk ) 08:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)


 * DGG, I apologize that I incorrectly understood that article can be moved out of the draft space into Wikipedia space after meeting your suggested notability requirements, whereas you meant that would be sufficient for a review. As you suggested, I made several changes to make article more neutral and will continue these efforts. Again, if there is anything specific not yet covered, please go ahead to make the changes.~Zina~ (talk) 17:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

Nixie drone → Nixie (drone) – The product seems to be called a "Nixie" rather than a "Nixie drone". McGeddon (talk) 09:57, 4 November 2014 (UTC)


 * McGeddon, this is a good suggestion. I moved the article.~Zina~ (talk) 17:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

The result of the move request was: page moved. ~Zina~ (talk) 17:10, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

and
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Request to remove advertisement tag
Hello McGeddon and DGG,

I did my best to rewrite the article in a more neutral tone and added a few more references (there are quite a bit more articles on this topic now). Would you consider removing the advertisement tag if you think the tone is now acceptable? If now, please suggest the necessary changes. Thanks in advance for your time! ~Zina~ (talk) 07:36, 11 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot for taking a look at the article, and for all your improvements DGG! I won't remove the ad tag just yet and will try co continue improving the article and its tone. ~Zina~ (talk) 06:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I made some additional improvements to the article tone, and now ready to remove the "advertisement tone" tag. If any changes are still needed, please feel free to suggest. ~Zina~ (talk) 04:50, 17 November 2014 (UTC)