Talk:No, Ma'am, That's Not History

dyk
Hey, @Rachel Helps (BYU), very interesting article! I would have fixed the cns if I could have figured them out, but we need them for DYK Valereee (talk) 18:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I think I fixed them--let me know if you still have questions. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 20:41, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey, @Rachel Helps (BYU)! The source for the DYK hook is good, but a citation at the end of summary section is still needed. This isn't a fiction novel where we can use the book itself to tell us plot points, we need someone discussing the content. If no one is discussing the content in a nonfiction book, it's always going to be open to "Who says so?" Right now the unsourced content is He presented many counter-arguments to Brodie's arguments, using logic to show inconsistency or casting doubt on her sources. He also criticized her psycho-historical method, stating that historians can't know what hidden emotions Joseph or Emma Smith felt unless they have a source that says so. There's opinion in there -- he used logic to show inconsistency to cast doubt on her sources, for instance. Who says so? Valereee (talk) 21:19, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I have two sources for the first sentence; for the second, I summarized more than one part of the book. I included direct quotes in the reference. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2023 (UTC)