Talk:No. 1 Flying Training School RAAF/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 00:20, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * prose:  (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * 2) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments
1. basic instruction taking. Suggest - with basic instruction taking
 * Done.

2. who served until 1929. Suggest - who commanded the unit until 1929.
 * Already two variations on "command" in the sentence, made it "led".

3. became the nucleus. Suggest - formed the nucleus.
 * Done.

4. varying. Suggest - varied.
 * Done.

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 00:20, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for reviewing. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice work Ian. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 13:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)