Talk:No. 1 Initial Flying Training School RAAF/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 15:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Short but sweet. Understandable given how long it existed for. Nothing to complain about, but I would mention the 1954 trophy in the lede. I'll pass it anyway and leave it up to you Ian.
 * Tks mate, done that. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:51, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Good job!♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: