Talk:No. 7 (brand)

Matrixyl
This article should either mention or point to matrixyl, no? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.51.51 (talk) 09:16, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Why? What's the relevance?-- Laun  chba  ller  17:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 26 November 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. JudgeRM  (talk to me)  21:40, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

No. 7 (brand) → No7 – The article was renamed without discussion. I reverted it back. Now I would like your opinions. If I see a unanimous opposition, I will withdrawal the proposal if I can. George Ho (talk) 20:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose, should be no absolute topic for any number No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5 No.6 No.8 No.9, though No.10 redirects to Downing Street which is fair enough. Can someone add an image? In ictu oculi (talk) 08:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose as it makes more sense to have No7 redirect to the disabig page. No rationale has been given to do otherwise. Dicklyon (talk) 02:14, 30 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.