Talk:No. 91 Wing RAAF/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jonas Vinther (talk · contribs) 22:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

I'll review this one first thing tomorrow, Ian. :) Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 22:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry Ian about the two-day delay - family stuff got in the way, but I'll review it now. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 23:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Is it well-written? Symbol support vote.svg
 * 1. Lead could use some paragraphs.
 * 2. I feel File:No. 91 Wing RAAF officers 1950 (AWM P01254.127).JPG has a waaaay to long caption. Might consider shorting it a bit.
 * 3. The D in "development" used in reference #8 should be capitalized so as to match reference #45.


 * Other than these three minor points, I don't see anything wrong with it. Excellent job.


 * Is it verifiable with no original research? Symbol support vote.svg
 * Is it broad in its coverage? Symbol support vote.svg
 * Is it neutral? Symbol support vote.svg
 * Is it stable? Symbol support vote.svg
 * Is it illustrated? Symbol wait.svg
 * The article meets the GA-criteria for sure, but would like response to those three, minor points I highlighted, so I'm going to put it on hold. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 23:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Jonas, I've acted on your three suggestions -- and tks for your kind words. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2014 (UTC)