Talk:No (Meghan Trainor song)/Archive 1

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on No (Meghan Trainor song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151226154145/http://www.sverigetopplistan.se/ to http://www.sverigetopplistan.se/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on No (Meghan Trainor song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170817083455/http://charts.monitorlatino.com/top20/Argentina/General/20160606 to http://charts.monitorlatino.com/top20/Argentina/General/20160606
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170113171233/http://www.buzzanglemusic.com/wp-content/uploads/BuzzAngle-Music-2016-U.S.-Report.pdf to http://www.buzzanglemusic.com/wp-content/uploads/BuzzAngle-Music-2016-U.S.-Report.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:26, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposing some changes
I was working on the major expansion of this article and it was bought to my attention that it should be discussed with the rest of you. These are the proposed contents. Does anyone think something could be done differently?--MaranoFan (talk) 14:50, 20 September 2018 (UTC)


 * , can you tell us why you think these edits are superior to what has already been the status quo in the article while you were blocked for disruption (then indeffed)? Why is what's there not being improved upon rather than just blanket reverted back to the last edits you made before you were blocked? -- ψλ  ● ✉ ✓ 00:43, 21 September 2018 (UTC)