Talk:No (Meghan Trainor song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Iceywarm2020 (talk · contribs) 02:00, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of No (Meghan Trainor song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article No (Meghan Trainor song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Iceywarm2020 (talk) 02:00, 28 February 2020 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Decision After further reviewing the article, and taking into account the massive editing being formed, and the lack of vandalism, this article is a Good Article. The article states clear opinions, an non copyrighted bias. With this being considered, I am going to pass the article.