Talk:No Heart (song)

Requested move 20 August 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved, considering that the rationale no longer applies due to the creation of No Heart (chief). (non-admin closure) Steel1943  (talk) 15:53, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

No Heart (song) → No Heart – The dab page is not needed, it can simply be replaced by a hatnote about the Care Bears character, who does not have his own article. 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:CDE0:362E:CA5:DE15 (talk) 12:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC) --Relisting.   Dr Strauss   talk   11:45, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose if there's a most notable in books it is the 1837 Iowa chief, if in vanilla Google the purple meanie from the Care Bears cartoon. Neither way this song .. which really ought to be merged to album. PS as per dozen previous dynamic IP RM requests, please please register for an account. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:16, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment – I would be for moving No Heart to No Heart (disambiguation) as well. 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:F5A1:DEA5:9C38:9E80 (talk) 12:52, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Support. Only subject with an article or real coverage at any other article.--Cúchullain t/ c 16:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * That is because Wikipedia's editor base is massively weighted to churning out articles on 43-charting 2016 hip hop songs and not on producing actual encyclopaedic content. I created No Heart (chief) very easily and quickly using a small fraction of plentiful sources, whereas there are zero sources for this song. Pathetic. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:34, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Following the creation of No Heart (chief), the song is no longer the only subject with coverage, so put me down as neutral now.--Cúchullain t/ c 15:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Support as the only page with this title. kennethaw88 • talk 18:10, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Content?
While we're here this is another song article which says nothing about the song. Nothing about the music, instrumentation, lyrics, just sales figures. Could we imagine a book article or film article which contained no content about the actual book or film? These perma-stubs really should be merged into albums. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:02, 28 August 2017 (UTC)