Talk:No Kidding!

Issues
What is the reason for the "neutrality" tag on the page? Joyous | Talk 23:19, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


 * It was added by an anon, who left the edit summary "(this was written by the group...)". Which isn't a reason - some actual content has to be disputed. I removed the tag. --Malthusian (talk) 13:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The totallydisputed tag replaced a cleanup tag; I did some wikilinking and other style changes and will probably cut down on the media apperances bit later, so I don't think it needs to go back on. --Malthusian (talk) 13:54, 8 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree, the media section needs to be trimmed. I'm now the media spokesperson for the group, and have recently become aware of Wikipedia policies that might make me editing inappropriate for COI reasons.  I've tried to retain neutral language and just add information.  It is worth noting that the two original authors of the article don't appear to be associated with us in any way. -Lciaccio (talk) 00:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

removed "pajama parties"
I'm sure some NK members have "pajama parties," and that's perfectly legitimate as far as it goes. However, "pajama parties" does not belong in a highly condensed representation of what one of the world's largest childfree organizations is all about. I feel sure "pajama parties" are an infrequent, if not rare, NK activity. In addition, there are so many uninformed people who equate the childfree lifestyle with "adult adolescence," swingers etc. that including "pajama parties" in a short list of compelling reasons to be involved with NK is counter-productive. Therefore, I removed the phrase "pajama parties" from this entry.


 * Agreed -Lciaccio (talk) 00:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)