Talk:No Me Dejes de Querer/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 18:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Averageuntitleduser (talk · contribs) 23:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'll be giving this a go! And ugh, those salsa vibes and horns are doing it for me. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 23:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Well-written
Nothing that a fresh pair of eyes can't bring up to scratch. Feel free to revert my copyedits/tweaks. Of course, lovely work here!
 * At the New Year's Eve concert in the same year — which concert? Any specific title or location?
 * In a similar review of the album, — this sentence is a bit confusing. Is this quote: "how little consequence she is", positive or negative? The conjunction "where" makes an unclear connection; do they believe that Reguiera outperformed her on the remix?
 * It became her Spanish-language — "first", "second", or some other qualifier seems missing.

Verifiable with no original research
A lot of prominent Mexican and American newspapers, looks good on a reliability front. Us Weekly is citing a pretty uncontroversial statement. As well, the New York Post is used minimally and only for opinion, its presence doesn't harm the article much. No copyvio issues during the spot-check. A fair few quotes in the "Reception" section, but it doesn't come off as heavy-handed.
 * Here's the Sun Sentinel review on Newspapers.com, the dead link can now be fixed!

Spot-check

 * I've removed one citation: the "radio-friendly" bit almost subtly implies the opposite. Looks good otherwise.
 * Looks good when translated.
 * Looks good with other ref.
 * Looks good when translated.
 * Looks good.
 * Looks good.
 * Looks good when translated.
 * Looks good.
 * Looks good.
 * Looks good.
 * Looks good.
 * Looks good.

Broad in its coverage
Preliminary checks on TWL, Google Books/News, ProQuest, Newspapers.com, as well as general searches, make me confident that the article is broad in coverage. At a glance, I was hoping for more about the instruments, mixing, genres, but some of these details are found in the "Reception" section. I think this structure works well!

Neutral
The consensus seems to be represented fairly, and all quotes or opinions are attributed.

Stable
No recent content disputes or edit wars.

Illustrated
Standard song cover, looks nice.
 * Consider writing the "not replaceable" and "respect for commercial oppurtunities" rationales.

Summary
@Magiciandude: Great work here! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 03:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry about the slight delay, I'm working on it now. Erick (talk) 16:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Averageuntitleduser Alright, I've addressed the issues brought up except for the non free rationale, which I replaced with the standard album/single template. Erick (talk) 16:39, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * No worries, and the license works nicely. Alright, one final comment! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 04:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Averageuntitleduser I fixed the dead link as requested. Erick (talk) 15:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Fabulous! Happy to promote. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 21:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)