Talk:No Pressure (film)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 02:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: one found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:13, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Substantive review will be posted within 24 hours. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:16, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Lead: Short sentences need consolidating perhaps two paras for a short article such as this.
 * A large number of short or single sentence paragraphs throughout the article need consolidation.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * One citation needed tag on the film's production needs addressing.
 * References check out, no OR.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * sufficient detail.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * One image used with suitable non-free use rationale.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:12, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, good to go. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 11:56, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:12, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, good to go. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 11:56, 28 March 2011 (UTC)