Talk:No Remorse (Motörhead album)

Links
Should we link up ALL the singles that appear on this comp. or leave KBD as the main 'singles link'? Alf 12:44, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
 * If a song has an article it should be linked. If the song doesn't have an article it's generally best not to be creating red links without careful consideration. --kingboyk 23:34, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Rename to avoid confusion
This should be renamed No Remorse (album) to avoid confusion with other uses, such as the band named No Remorse.Spylab 00:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Spylab
 * 4 months later and No Remorse was still a redirect to No Remorse (album). I've moved it back; we don't use disambiguation words in article titles for the sake of it. --kingboyk 23:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

No No Remorse
There is no Wikipedia article for the neo-Nazi band No Remorse. Who are these people? Why is there no article on them? Bastie 08:53, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

i agree, if neo-nazi bands like Blue eyed evils can have a articale No remorse should have one because its alot more "famous" in that music scene

Songwriter Credits
My (old and knackered) 1988 CD edition has the new tracks credited to Kilmister and Burston. Likewise, the article for "Killed by Death" has the same credits. This article, however, lists Burston, Campbell, Gill, Kilmister. Which is correct? --kingboyk 20:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Under The Knife
Whats the difference between track 13 and 14 on the second CD? I've seen some listed just as "Under The Knife" for both and also "Under The Knife (12" Version)" for both, yet the songs are different length. Can someone clarify this?

Yeah: they're actually different songs, sharing the same title. As simple, yet strange, as that. Neither version was on the original issue of this compilation but were added as bonus tracks for the 2CD remaster. Al —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.97.197 (talk) 06:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:No remorse.jpg
Image:No remorse.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Disambiguation page
I think that there are enough other articles with the title "No Remorse" somewhere in them that a disambiguation page should be created. Does anyone else agree?--Classicrockfan42 (talk) 19:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * That can easily be done with a  For other uses, see No Remorse (disambiguation)  tag as in the Motorhead article itself. This would keep this article in place, of course, which would save on any link changing along the way. – B.hotep •talk• 19:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Done.--Alf melmac 08:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)