Talk:No Sé Tú/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dontuseurrealname (talk · contribs) 01:59, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination criteria
This article is currently undergoing its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of August 1, 2023, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: The article is well-written and appears to not contain any grammatical errors.
 * 2. Verifiable?: All references are verifiable and the article contains no original research.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: The article is broad in its coverage and stays on topic.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: The article stays neutral and contains no bias.
 * 5. Stable?: The article is stable.
 * 6. Images?: The article is properly illustrated and all media follows Wikipedia's guidelines.

I recommend that some cleanup should be done with the Luis Miguel version section. I seperated the information into corresponding sections (reception, music video, charts).

I added a charts section myself since that was missing. Most articles cite AMPROFON's chart data, which is behind a paywall. Notitas Musicales is a fairly reliable source, as data was gathered by Radio Mil, who provided Billboard's Hits of the World charts, and it's completely free. A selection of the charts are published by Radio Mil on Facebook, which is, perhaps unfortunately, the main method of sourcing the chart data. Besides that, this article is pretty good, especially by Latin music standards.

Sincerely, Dontuseurrealname (talk) 01:59, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Status query
Dontuseurrealname, Erick, where does this nomination stand? As far as I can tell, no one but Dontuseurrealname has edited the article since the review began. Erick, if you aren't prepared to work on the article, perhaps the nomination should be closed. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi. I have been busy with schoolwork, so I have not been able to properly reply for some time. I am still awaiting Erick for their opinion, but they are not responding to my posts on their talk page. I personally think that the article is acceptable for GA status, but I want to hear some feedback from Erick.
 * Sincerely, Dontuseurrealname (talk) 15:06, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I'll get to work on this on Sunday or Monday. Erick (talk) 17:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @Dontuseurrealname I did some adjustments myself including adding the year-end charts and moved the commercial performance to the reception area. Is there anything I might be missing? Erick (talk) 17:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * There is one thing I would like to be changed, and that is the chart position for Mexico. I found out that El Informador (I believe through El Siglo de Torreón) published chart positions for several Latin American countries. I do not have much time but I will try to add them as soon as possible. Otherwise, this article is viable for GA.
 * Sincerely, Dontuseurrealname (talk) 17:55, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I replaced the chart position with the El Informador one. This article seems like a GA to me!
 * Sincerely, Dontuseurrealname (talk) 12:53, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @Dontuseurrealname @Magiciandude another three weeks has gone by. Can this be wrapped up now? RoySmith (talk) 20:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, I guess so.
 * – Dontuseurrealname (talk) 22:26, 6 November 2023 (UTC)