Talk:No Warning (band)

Stubbed
Per. One of the band states that most of what was written is nonsense, and has tried several times to stub the article for rework but has been reverted. Guy (Help!) 19:57, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, no?
Most of what was written was from an official biography of the band and the information I gathered from the booklets in the CDs I own. If that was nonsense, they released it themselves in the first place. Yes, other users added nonsense to my initial article, but I (and others) have tried to keep it clean. How can you be so sure it was a band member, and why did that person not say so immediately (and instead started deleting stuff consistently)? I'm just going to revert it back again till I get an answer to this. I think it's just nonsense. —Nay
 * See above. When the subject says it's wrong, that usually means the sources are wrong or misinterpreted. Guy (Help!) 23:32, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It's paraphrased information from official releases. I kind of doubt it was an actual band member responding to this. In any way, too much information was removed. There was some potential nonsense in there (later additions) but some of it could have really stayed. I think you're being stupid, here. I mean... I can check when a CD was released, and on what record label. It's in the damn booklet and it's really easy to verify with the record company. Why on earth does that have to go, too? —Nay 16 March 2008
 * I went through the various stages of the article and places together the most wikipedia appropriate article. [ lukethespook ] | [ t c r ] 12:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)