Talk:No nit policy/Archive 1

Orphaned references in School head lice policy
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of School head lice policy's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Burgess1995": From Head-louse infestation:  From Head louse:  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)


 * AnomieBOT, you rock. Noca2plus (talk) 00:33, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

GA review
A review has started. Comments are here.  SilkTork  *YES! 18:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The article did not meet the GA criteria. It may be resubmitted when issues have been addressed. See Talk:School head lice policy/GA1 for full explanation and suggestions.  SilkTork  *YES! 19:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

WP:NURSE priority check
I have rated this article as 'low' importance according to WikiProject_Nursing/Assessment. If you disagree, please leave a note here so we can discuss it. Honestly, I'm not even completely sure it belongs in the nursing wikiproject at all. Cheers, Basie (talk) 12:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Do you have a suggestion as to what wikiproject it might fall under? It seems a bit removed from WP:MED because it focuses primarily on school policy rather than the disease itself.  I thought the nursing project would be good because it is the school nurse that is primarily responsible for setting and executing such policies. Noca2plus (talk) 20:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, I've since been informed of that by someone over at WP:MED so I guess this is just one of those areas I know little about! ;) I thought it would sit nicely under the education project, but there's no reason it can't be in both. Cheers, Basie (talk) 00:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)