Talk:Nobel disease/Archive 1

Decline
you've declined this as not notable. Did you look at the additional evidence I provided above?

You left a note indicating an WP:OR problem. Clearly there is room for improvement here. It deserves a decline only if there is a severe enough of a problem to cause it to be likely to be deleted at WP:AFD. ~Kvng (talk) 15:18, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If they're different than what appears in the draft then, no, I did not. BEFORE is a process used in Articles for Deletion, not Articles for Creation. In fact, the AfC reviewing guide at WP:AFCR strongly implies that reviewers should base their decision on references contained in the submission only, to wit: "If what is written in the submission meets the notability guidelines, but the submission lacks references to evidence this, then the underlying issue is inadequate verification and the submission should be declined for that reason." You are free to incorporate these references into the article and resubmit it. Chetsford (talk) 02:09, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * This is clearly notable so I'm invoking WP:NORULES and have accepted this. ~Kvng (talk) 14:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Michael Levitt
Levitt is a relevant recent example of Nobel disease according to whom? To you. Therefore, WP:OR. I'm reverting again unless you find a WP:RS saying that Levitt is an example of nobelitis. VdSV9• ♫ 11:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)