Talk:Noble gas/GA2

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Noble gas/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


 * I'm inclined to let this article pass. NoDepositNoReturn (talk) 01:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I've noticed a few small things (typos, etc.) but it looks like people are busily cleaning that up right now. I think that ought to have been done before being nominated for GA, but if it takes actually having a review in progress to get it done, then at least it's being done. I'll have a full review soon; the one comment I have right now is that particular attention should be paid to how multiple paragraphs flow together; in some places it looks like things had been ordered differently and rearranged. It's subtle, but gives the feeling that it was built by patchwork (which it was, but it should read smoothly.) I don't think there's anything here that will block a pass, though. I'll try to have a full review done by tomorrow. NoDepositNoReturn (talk) 23:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree with that assessment, pass. --Gene Hobbs (talk) 13:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I concur. Silverchemist (talk) 13:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: How long does this GAN need to be open? Several ppl agree, is there more required? Nergaal (talk) 03:18, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I've not had a chance to write up my full review, but if someone wants to take over the lead on this, go ahead -- I've been mostly offline all week.NoDepositNoReturn (talk) 22:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Because of consensus, User:ThinkBlue (who was going to review this article today) has suggested that this article be passed, and so it has. Gary King ( talk ) 23:19, 26 June 2008 (UTC)