Talk:Noble gas configuration

Notation and configuration
This article now redirects to "Noble gas notation" but notation is something very different from configuration. I don't think the redirect is useful at all, even misleading. CodeCat (talk) 17:32, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

O K friend I would prepare this article and provide useful information related to the topic. Skr15081997 (talk) 10:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Please Don't delete this article.
Dears admins please don't delete this article .This article is extremely important for users concerned with chemistry. I have put a stub tag in this article because it needs further expansion but this article need not be deleted.Skr15081997 (talk) 11:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Reason missing
The article doesn't explain why these configurations are the noble gas configurations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.86.190 (talk) 23:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Noble gas configuration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131125222947/http://osulibrary.oregonstate.edu:80/specialcollections/coll/pauling/bond/papers/corr216.3-lewispub-19160400.html to http://osulibrary.oregonstate.edu/specialcollections/coll/pauling/bond/papers/corr216.3-lewispub-19160400.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 16:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Convert to disambig
I have converted this page to a disambiguation following the discussion at talk:octet rule.--Officer781 (talk) 02:59, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I have now converted this to a redirect to electron configuration.--Officer781 (talk) 14:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * As mentioned in my edit summary, I agree that this is the best solution. Dab pages with only two entries are often a little bit pointless, and for this title one of the two entries was only marginally relevant while one of them gave a nice summary of the subject.  Could perhaps add a "with possibilities" cat although I don't know if it would be notable as a standalone article.  Could always discuss a split at the redirect target if that section is ever developed enough.  Lithopsian (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)