Talk:Nokia Lumia 930

whats the price in india and nepal ?
 * Ask an Indian or Nepali retailer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.156.255.22 (talk) 11:14, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Merger Discussion
Oppose Separate product, thus separate page. --Lumia930uploader (talk) 20:08, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Support - as long as this is the target page, not the Icon. &#60;&#60;&#60; SOME GADGET GEEK &#62;&#62;&#62; (talk) 16:03, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Why? The Nokia Lumia Icon is a second generation handset, while the Nokia Lumia 930 is a third generation handset, they are both designed for different markets, the Icon is US only, and the 930 is international. --Lumia930uploader (talk) 07:43, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Support - Everything inside the 930 and Icon is same, except the radio bands. 2nd or 3rd generation doesn't really matter as the release date was not far each other. Bijak riyandi (talk) 09:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Because these 2 products are differently branded reviewers and reliable sources list them as different telephones so if we'd merge the pages we would have a confusing mix.
 * Sincerely, --86.81.201.94 (talk) 11:54, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Oppose different articles often cover devices that are barely different from the same series but have a differentiating factor such as one having an inch bigger screen, and the fact that one is only sold in America, runs different firmware, and 930 gets camera features from the lumia camera beta that the icon doesn't. --42.113.73.178 (talk) 01:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Oppose The Icon and the 930 are different, no reason to merge these articles. CyanoTex (talk) 19:19, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Support same phone, different markets, which could easily be explained in the intro, with both names bolded.--Z oupan 08:12, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Nope, the Nokia Lumia Icon receives different updates and is supported differently from the Nokia Lumia 930, and the devices aren't even completely identical.
 * Sincerely, --86.81.201.94 (talk) 14:25, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Support seems the same phone to me. CombatWombat42 (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

I looked at doing this merge and determined that: I'm personally going to give this one a pass for now. ~Kvng (talk) 15:06, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) There is not a strong consensus to merge
 * 2) The merge is non-trivial
 * 3) Neither article is of high importance to any wikiproject
 * Agree that it was a low priority, but given that there was consensus I acted on it. ✅ Klbrain (talk) 23:17, 17 December 2017 (UTC)


 * I have undone the merge per WP:BRD. As the discussion took place over two years ago (approaching 2.5 years) and there was never a clear consensus then, per WP:CCC I do not believe their is/was strong enough consensus to merge the articles so far later and that even if there was at some point, the time that has elapsed has caused the articles to evolve beyond what was originally discussed.  The discussion took place, was never clear, and died down years ago.  Further, a parallel discussion on the other article's talk page came to a differing conclusion.  Given these reasons, combined with others, I do not believe merging the articles so far later is prudent and have undone the merge.  Mifter (talk) 09:24, 25 December 2017 (UTC)