Talk:Nolot

This article has a lot of technical terms that people who do not have experience with chess would not understand. This should be rewritten into a more user-friendly article with less technical talk. MJ 16:26, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Clean up
I have redone the diagrams using the board template, stripped out or commented out the editorializing/narrating commentary/OR ("Computer X shouldn't be able to solve this for 10 years" and my favorite "Ribli is a solid player...") and reworked the remaining annotations to have them read cleaner. The main thing missing here are sources; the web does pull up some, and I have to guess some standard computer chess books refer to this suite. If anyone has any of these books, your assistance in soucring this article is greatly appreciated. Baccyak4H (Yak!) 16:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Name
Should be Nolot test suite or Nolot chess test suite. --AndrejJ (talk) 15:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I made those pages into redirects back here. I have no strong opinions about which should be the main page.  Baccyak4H (Yak!) 15:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Nolot 9
"B2b. 4.Qg4 gxf6 5.gxf6 Nxd3 (5...Bf8? 6.Qh3+ Kg8 7.Bh6! is winning) 6.Rxd3 Bf8 7.Rdd1 is unclear."

Stockfish at depth >30 thinks 7. Rdd1 is a bad move:

FEN: r1r2b1k/5p2/2n1pPb1/p3P3/1p1p1BQ1/3R2P1/qP3PB1/2R3K1 w - - 1 7 31/56 +2,48  Rcd1 Qc4 Qh4+ Kg8 Qg5 Kh7 Bf1 Nxe5 Bxe5 Bh6 Qh4 Qc5 Re1 Rg8 Rxd4 Rad8 Rxd8 Rxd8 g4 Qf8 g5 a4 Bg2 Bf5 Ra1 a3 bxa3 b3 Re1 31/56 +1,13  Qh4+ Kg8 Rd2 Nxe5 Rcd1 Nd7 Rxd4 Ra7 Be4 Qa4 Bxg6 fxg6 f7+ Kxf7 Qh8 Qb5 Be3 e5 R4d3 Nf6 Bxa7 e4 R3d2 Qf5 Qh4 b3 Be3 Bb4 31/56 +0,79  Rd2 Nxe5 Qh4+ Bh7 Rxc8 Rxc8 Bxe5 Qb1+ Kh2 Qe1 Qxd4 Kg8 Bd6 Rd8 Qf4 Bg6 Bxb4 Rxd2 Bxd2 Qe2 Bc3 Qh5+ Bh3 Bc5 f3 Qd5 Bf1 31/56  0,00  Rdd1 Qxb2 Bxc6 Rxc6 Rxc6 d3 Rd2 Qb1+ Rd1 Qb2 31/56  0,00  Qh3+ Kg8 Rcd1 Bxd3 Rxd3 Qb1+ Bf1 Nxe5 Bxe5 Rc1 Qg4+ Kh8 Qh4+ Kg8 Qg4+ 31/56  0,00  Re1 Bxd3 Qh4+ Kg8 Qg5+ Bg6 Be4 Ra7 Bxg6 fxg6 Qxg6+ Bg7 Bh6 Qd5 f4 Nxe5 fxe5 d3 Bxg7 Qc5+ Kf1 d2 Bh6+ Kh8 Bg7+ Kg8 31/56  0,00  Kh2 Bxd3 Rh1 Bh7 Be4 Bxe4 Kg1+ Bxh1 Qh5+ Kg8 Qg4+ Kh7 Qh4+ Kg6 Qg4+ Kh7 31/56 -1,14  Rxc6 Rxc6 Rxd4 Qxb2 Be3 Qb1+ Kh2 Qf5 Qh4+ Kg8 Bxc6 Rc8 Rf4 Qh5 Ba4 Qxh4+ Rxh4 Rc3 Bd4 Ra3 Bd7 Bf5 Rf4 Rd3 Rxf5 exf5

analysis after 7. Rcd1:

FEN: r1r2b1k/5p2/2n1pPb1/p3P3/1p1p1BQ1/3R2P1/qP3PB1/3R2K1 b - - 2 7 33/62 +2,74  Qc4 Qh4+ Kg8 Qg5 Kh7 Bf1 Nxe5 Bxe5 Bh6 Qh4 Qc5 Re1 Rg8 Rxd4 Rad8 Rxd8 Rxd8 g4 Rd2 g5 Kg8 gxh6 Kh7 Qf4 Qc2 Bc4 Rd1 33/62 +3,44  Qxb2 Qh4+ Kg8 Qg5 Qe2 Bf3 Qa2 Be4 Bg7 Bxg6 fxg6 Qxg6 Rc7 g4 b3 Rh3 Qc2 Rdd3 b2 Rh8+ Kxh8 Rh3+ Kg8 Qxc2 Rb8 Rb3 Rcb7 33/62 +4,45  Bxd3 Qh5+ Kg8 Rxd3 Qb1+ Bf1 Nxe5 Qxe5 Rc5 Qe2 Kh8 Qg4 Rf5 Qh4+ Kg8 g4 Rxf6 Qxf6 Bg7 Qg5 Qe1 Rxd4 Re8 Rd7 a4 Be3 Qb1 Qf4 33/62 +9,84  Kg8 Be4 Bg7 Bxg6 fxg6 Qxg6 Ra7 g4 Qd5 Rh3 Nxe5 Qh7+ Kf8 fxg7+ Rxg7 Bh6 Rcc7 Qh8+ Ke7 Qxg7+ Kd6 Qf8+ Kc6 Bf4 Kb7 Rh8 33/62 +10,28 Qa4 Qh4+ Kg8 g4 Qc2 Rh3 Bh7 Bf1 Bh6 Qxh6 Qg6 Qh4 Kf8 Bd3 Ke8 Qxh7 Qxh7 Rxh7 Rab8 Be4 Rb5 Rh8+ Kd7 Rxc8 Kxc8 Bxc6 Rb6 33/62 +11,41 Bh7 Qh4 Kg8 g4 Qa4 Bf1 Qc2 Rh3 Bh6 Qxh6 Qg6 Qh4 Kf8 Bd3 Ke8 Qxh7 Qxh7 Rxh7 Rab8 Be4 Rb5 Rh8+ Kd7 Rxc8 Kxc8 Bxc6 Rb6

So above line should be changed into "7.Rcd1 is winning."? --176.198.187.19 (talk) 15:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)