Talk:Nomadic Theatre

Peer Review
Positive Comments

1. The article is divided very clearly, with many different sections. No one wants to see 10 paragraphs of text in a row, so it is good that there are no long blocks of text that aren’t broken up by some type of bullet point or bold subhead or something.

2. The past collaborations and community outreach section is interesting, and shows how Nomadic Theatre is a part of the larger Georgetown community. Nothing at college exists in a vacuum, and it is great that you made this clear in your article.

Issues

1. The article is a little short on links to other Wikipedia pages within the text. For example, you could link the phrase “social awareness” in the opening paragraph to the Wikipedia article on social awareness. There are many other places where you could do this, and it wouldn’t be too time-consuming.

2. Add at least one image. Since the whole “nomadic” thing means that there is no one theatre which the group can call home, maybe you could take pictures of all the places where they perform, and spread them throughout the article. If worse comes to worse, just use a picture of the front gates from the Georgetown Wikipedia page or something.

Overall, great job!

Jraytram (talk) 19:39, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Comments
Clearly organized and written entry. I can see the challenges in coming up with information that is documented for this subject. But good job creating an entry out of that. I second Jraytram's suggestions above for things to add -- internal links to other Wikipedia entries will give your entry broader relevance. You might even link to some of the plays, etc. And yes, find a picture if you can, even if it is just pulling from the Georgetown University Wikipedia page. If you are feeling particularly creative, you might make a list or a box of the plays that Nomadic Theatre has performed over the years. Nice work! Radavis147 (talk) 15:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC)radavis147