Talk:Non-Euclidean surface growth

A modest request
Can someone explain this topic in common English so that anyone with a high school education could understand it? It might make perfect sense to someone with a Masters' degree in mathematics, but as it currently stands, this article is a mess of jargon & technical gobblity-gook. -- llywrch (talk) 22:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Useless article
This article is nonsensical. Disregarding the poor writing, I doubt it would make sense even to people familiar with the material. The author also apparently doesn't know how to properly code citations. Please merge with Non-Euclidean geometry or similar article, or delete entirely. MaribelGame (talk) 17:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The article makes sense to me and this seems a real topic, but I agree the English was garbled. I tried a quick rewrite to make the prose a little more clear. I wouldn't be opposed to a merge as an application of Non-Euclidean geometry or Riemannian geometry. -- 16:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)