Talk:Non-faradaic electrochemical modification of catalytic activity

"9000%"?
I'll chime in. I haven't looked up the reference, so I don't know if this is the verbatim expression used, and if so it should be in quotes. But in general, percents significantly greater than 100 are misleading, or appear to attempt to be misleading... May I suggest "90-fold", which carries less of a sense of intentional misdirection without materially altering the meaning? Gaedheal (talk) 22:33, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * This paper - Platinum Metas Rev., 1990, 34, (3), 122-130 - says "steady-state catalytic rate increase can be up to a factor of 3 x 105 higher than the steady-state rate of ion transfer through the electrolyte." --Kkmurray (talk) 23:19, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Great! Maybe that could be in the article, with a reference? Gaedheal (talk) 23:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I think that this is the original work: Vayenas, Bebelis and Ladas, Nature, 1990, 343, 625 . --Kkmurray (talk) 00:41, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm trying to edit this article along with following structures.

1. Introduction of EPOC effects 2. The examples and research area (solid electrolytes & high-temperature systems) 3. The proposed mechanistic origin of the EPOC effects 4. EPOC effects in an aqueous electrolyte solution at ambient temperature

Any suggestions?

Jaeyune (talk) 21:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Merge proposal
The May merge proposal to merge Non-faradaic electrochemical modification of catalytic activity and Electrochemical promotion of catalysis sounds very reasonable, with this page being perhaps the best target; overlap and context. Klbrain (talk) 09:29, 13 October 2022 (UTC)