Talk:Non-interactive zero-knowledge proof

Untitled
Page 20 of Definitions and Properties of Zero-Knowledge Proof Systems, Goldreich, Oren, give impossibility results for one shot zero-knowledge protocols in the standard model. This does not hold for the common reference sting model or the random oracle model.

Special Course on Cryptology / Zero Knowledge: Random Oracles and Fiat-Shamir Heuristic http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/460680.html

Add a paragraph between par 1 and par 2, describing how RO and CRS can be used to turn ZK into NIZK.

par 3 is then about the limitations of NIZK, maybe it is also possible to write about concurrent security, and non malleability.

--Markulf 15:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

This page, while interesting, doesn't actually explain how an example of a NIZKP might actually work. This page would be really helped by having a worked example. Mpdehnel (talk) 10:04, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Why does the introduction specifically mention Bulletproofs? There are tens of NIZK papers published every year. Although a nice result, I don't see it being that influential in the grand scheme of things. Also, is it important which paper introduced the acronym SNARK? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.255.183.210 (talk) 19:49, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Opinionated? -- Reference to a certain cryptocurrency
The article has a reference to the zCash cryptocurrency but not to other cryptocurrencies (like Monero) that are also based on this technology. The article therefore appears opinionated towards Starkware, zCash ect.. Please make it more neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.45.12.194 (talk) 22:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

"Non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs" are something completly different than proof of work
The article currently contains a whole lot of information about proof of work. Although both of these topics both come up in cryptocurrencies, they are actually very different topics. Maybe someone just thought they are the same or similar, because they both contain the word "proof"? In general the article isn't up to date as it doesn't contain any information about Halo (2). --BlauerBaum (talk) 23:46, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

attribution for copied text and references
Touftoufikas (talk) 14:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)