Talk:Non-statutory law

This article is "original research," as evidenced by the comment of the original author, below. The author has a point of view about non-statutory law, which is fine, but not appropriate for wikipedia. The legitimate topic of the common law (as that term is generally understood) is better treated elsewhere. Editing by others appears to have removed some of the point of view from the article, but as this is gradually removed, the article has less reason for being. Please note that I'm not disparaging anyone's efforts, just the appropriateness of this article in light of the stated goals and standards of Wikipedia. I suggest either deletion or, if there is something worth keeping here, incuding some references. --Sjsilverman 04:09, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

The editorial on Common Law v Statutory law is the result of a number of years of intensive study of the law as used in the courts today. I have a number of case citations that need to go with this edited article. If someone would like to work with me to organize better, it would be appreciated. My goal is education. My E-mail is billmay@wvi.com.