Talk:Nonzero-rule

This page stinks. There's no pretty diagram and the description doesn't make sense without further information.


 * Hopefully I've fixed that. Although my 'pretty diagram' isn't currently displaying, unless you follow the links to view it at full size: Wikimedia's servers are running like a dog right now, so maybe they're just catching up with generating the thumbnails... Hey, I'll take a chance that I've improved things sufficiently, and take down the 'this article is confusing' notice. Fuzzypeg★ 10:38, 3 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the image, Fuzzypeg -- however, your pretty diagram appears to be incorrect. I believe the topmost arrow in the lower-right diagram is facing the wrong direction. Vynce (talk) 23:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

I do agree with Vynce, the arrow is in the wrong direction. Please correct that as it makes difficult for (some) people to understand the algorithm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.120.4.153 (talk) 19:52, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

After spending half an hour on trying to understand how the author drew that curve, I corrected the arrows. --Christi3443 (talk) 21:12, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

I think the alternative terms "Winding" for Nonzero-Rule and "Alternate" for Even-odd rule as used by Microsoft should be added. A description of these terms can be found at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.drawing.drawing2d.fillmode(v=vs.110).aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.193.43.82 (talk) 10:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)