Talk:Noobelf

This page should NOT be deleted because there is one noobelf spamming in it. It's a legitimate article that applies to anyone who has ever played warcraft III, as well as those interested in internet culture.


 * As a person who's been playing Warcraft III since it came out (in europe) I can tell you: NEVER in my life have I EVER heard any play get referred to as a 'noobelf' and it is my personal assesment that it is a term made up by the original poster of this article. And I personally feel that it should be deleted on the basis that it is quite simply too obscure to have a place on Wiki. Furthermore it is not NPOV-compliant and it lacks an encyclopedic structure.

Robrecht 8 July 2005 16:37 (UTC)

I'm totally disputing this
This article is:

Extremely obscure, it has no true relevance to anything outside a single game, more over the term itself is obscure. While the behaviour referred to in the article does occur and I'm aware of it myself, 'noobelf' or 'noobelfing' is NOT common terminology used for this behaviour.

Furthermore the article is in NPOV violation, since it repeatedly states opinions and uses opionated language and made up words such as 'This perplexing view arises' and 'overpoweredness', 'underpowedered' and the whole tirade against Blizzard Employee T Caldwell.

On the whole this article is an attempt made by one group of people to make derisive comments about another group of people, all the while trying and failing to make it sound like an informative piece.

I'm putting this one up for deletion. Robrecht 23:35, 11 July 2005 (UTC)