Talk:Nora Samosir

Removal of unencyclopedic lists
The lists&mdash;without context or indication of importance (the citations for some list items do not serve this purpose) are unencyclopedic. Highlights, and indications of why they are highlights are appropriate for an article. This is not IMDb or IBDb. Bongo matic  07:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I am IN THE PROCESS of sourcing the theater performance to critcal reviews of the work and her parts in it. PLEASE do not remove my work until I am finished and the sources are all in. Thank you. FURTHER, nearly all actors of note here on wiki have lists (albeit partial) to their works. A notable theater actress is no exception to that established protocol. I do not expect to leave them all, as that would be ridiculous, but a representative sample lends understanding to readers of the article, her work, and its notability.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:27, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Geez Bongo, the article has an inuse tag on it and is being actively edited - and you step in and delete a huge swath of stuff that the active editor may in fact be working on. Sheesh. At least I added an "n" and quietly de-orphaned the article (1 link only!). Sure, deletion can be constructive, but addition is better, though it's much more difficult. Give it a shot sometime. Franamax (talk) 08:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Simmer down, people. The inuse template had been added eleven hours before my edit. While I now see that my edit was shortly after one of MQS's, when I opened the article (before I clicked "edit"), there had been no changes to the article in about five hours&mdash;beyond the "use-by" date of inuse. Bongo  matic  12:20, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Aplogy accepted. Unlike some editors that do their improvements one by one by one by one by one, hitting save after each of dozens and dozens of minor edits, I am one who begins his edits, and hits "preview" over and over to assure visual quality, content and article flow to catch errors before finally hitting "save"... only because I remember the admonishment that mainspace is not the place for experimentation. With the number of aditional sources that appeared within seconds of the revert, you might understand that though underatandably difficult for a non-English subject, my searches were somewhat successful. This is my method to improve the project. Thank you for yourself being on top of my edits. It is reassuring to know I am being closely watched. No harm. No foul.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 16:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Nora Samosir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081219221328/http://www.sdea.org.sg:80/bios.htm to http://www.sdea.org.sg/bios.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 07:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

RfC on content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs
There is a current RFC on certain content in Singapore artistes BLP articles that editors watching/editing/passing through this article may be interested in weighing in: Requests for comment/Content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs. This article may be affected due to the inclusion of Category:Singaporean actors‎ and/or one of its subcategories in the article. RobertskySemi (talk) 23:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)