Talk:Norah Head Light/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  intelati  talk  01:21, 21 November 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Minor thing, the Light keepers section should be expanded or combined into another section
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * nice range of sources
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Understandable to the n00b
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * the only non free image can't be replaced, and adds to the value of the article
 * 1) Overall: One thing above needs to be done, and then I will pass the article
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall: One thing above needs to be done, and then I will pass the article
 * Pass/Fail:


 * I merged the light keepers section into the history section. --Muhandes (talk) 06:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC)