Talk:Nord Stage/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 09:19, 18 August 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * " of Stockholm, Sweden. " perhaps "in ..."?
 * ✅ Changed to Stockholm in Sweden and wikilinked -- Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)   18:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Footnotes should be placed behind commas in "Reception" :)
 * ✅ Have done a few of these MOS fixes recently, and of course the last thing I did before the GA review would not have them. Anyway, fixed. :-) -- Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)   18:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Aye. Good work! :) Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 17:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Aye. Good work! :) Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 17:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall: Aye. Good work! :) Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 17:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail: