Talk:Norid/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 22:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: one found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Thanks for taking the time to review the article. I meant "domain disputes" and fix it to that. Thanks for the copyedit. Arsenikk (talk)  09:53, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * to determine domain deputes Is domain disputes meant? Or deputising of domains? Or something else?
 * I made a few minor copy-edits.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Sources check out, all are reliable.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Thorough and focussed.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * On logo used with appropriate tag and rationale.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, just one query. On Hold for seven days.
 * OK, thanks for fixing that. I am happy to pass this as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:03, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, just one query. On Hold for seven days.
 * OK, thanks for fixing that. I am happy to pass this as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:03, 24 October 2010 (UTC)