Talk:Norman Zinberg

Needs more work
This article had deep-rooted NPOV issues; the article read like a bald-faced ad for...well, something. That's a real shame, because it looks like Dr. Zinberg actually did some worthwhile work in his field, but the tone was as far as you can get from the Wikipedia ideal. I think I weeded out the opinions from the factual parts this morning (more like I left in a few parts that were represented as facts), and I checked and verified the cited sources, but I'm still deeply unhappy with the results. Maybe an impartial editor with more familiarity with the subject could take a look? --Enwilson (talk) 23:12, 15 March 2009 (UTC)