Talk:Norske Tog Class 93/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Specific comments
 * Need to explain what a "bogie" is in the second paragraph of Specifications.
 * I"ve accepted the non-English sources on good faith.
 * The one explanation needed is not enough to hold this back from GA, so I'll be passing this now. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time to review the article. I have linked to bogie, and put in a short explanation. Arsenikk (talk)  15:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)