Talk:North American XB-70 Valkyrie/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:21, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * Issue resolved.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * Issue resolved.
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * The "missile problem" section can be better summarized. Issues resolved.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * One more thing, and it should work. Long article, but is sufficient for GA.  Since this is my first review, asking for a second opinion, to double check my work.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * One more thing, and it should work. Long article, but is sufficient for GA.  Since this is my first review, asking for a second opinion, to double check my work.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * One more thing, and it should work. Long article, but is sufficient for GA.  Since this is my first review, asking for a second opinion, to double check my work.


 * Hi RCLC, I think you did a damn fine job on this review. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:46, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Due to second opinion rendered, article passes. Congratulations to the editors woes efforts contributed to this achievement. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC)