Talk:North Carolina Highway 98/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 18:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, will post my comments soon. Sainsf &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 18:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Fairly well-written, only a few comments:
 * In the lead, small-to-medium-sized Are the first and second hyphens needed?
 * In Route description,
 * "concurrency" may be linked (if you repeat links from the lead)
 * and NC 50, have a Comma not required
 * Source(s) for the 2nd para?


 * In History,
 * NC 98 was rerouted west again "again" appears redundant
 * NC 98 was rerouted in Durham: replacing the old alignment I think it should be a comma, not a colon


 * In Junction list,
 * I am not sure if Google Maps is a proper source.
 * It is considered to be a "last resort" method of sourcing to a tenth of a mile, when there are no official mileages from the state. Some FAs do have it, such as U.S. Route 50 in Nevada. --Rschen7754 02:08, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, then we can have it here. Sainsf  (talk · contribs) 06:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Is each point in the table sourced?

These addressed, I would be happy to promote this. Cheers! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 10:29, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * --Rschen7754 02:07, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

I am happy to do these right now however I do have several comments. First Google Maps has been a proper source for items like Route Description for my last several GA's (North Carolina Highway 102 and North Carolina Highway 68). I will also look at the table to see if it is sourced or not, I did not create it however I did verify the mileage.--Ncchild (talk) 21:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * So I have completed the corrections that were specified above. As far as the table souces I did look into what other GA articles have and it appears to be in line. --Ncchild (talk) 21:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response. This can be promoted now. Sainsf  (talk · contribs) 09:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)