Talk:North Greenwich railway station

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

Not moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:56, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

North Greenwich railway station → North Greenwich railway station (disused) — Needs word disused adding to avoid confusion when this station is placed on Google maps. —Andrewhesselden (talk) 00:57, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose: There is no confusion between disused and open stations on Google Maps; the latter carry the British Rail logo, and the former (and some technically-open-but-not-really) do not. Sceptre (talk) 01:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strongly oppose There is no general confusion. There would be hundreds of station articles to rename for a consistent approach and since readers might not be sure of the status of the stations of their searches there would have to be hundreds of redirects. Resuscitated stations or names re-used at other sites would add to the chaos.--SilasW (talk) 12:17, 23 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose - most other closed stations are named as opened ones and with the article stating it is closed, this should be enough to distinguish between stations. Simply south (talk) 18:18, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose The business of google maps, or any other non-wiki project, is of no relevance to wikipedia. There is no indication that there is currently a possible situation of ambiguity vis-a-vis another wikipedia article. The qualifier is necessary. --Labattblueboy (talk) 19:35, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.