Talk:North Korea

Biased Sources
A lot of the claims in the article source American institutions such as the CIA. I understand this is an incredibly difficult topic to gather credible, unbiased information from and I don't think the solution is to use North Korean sources, but it doesn't sit right with me that the second or maybe even first biggest enemy of North Korea is constantly used as a source; especially considering America's false smear campaigns towards other countries in the past. Oranguru765 (talk) 04:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The CIA World Factbook is cited for statistical data, on measurements such as GDP and division of labour. What alternate sources with similar data would you like other editors to take a look at? Yue 🌙 05:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Yue The CIA portion was more so 1 example out of many, and if that example was erroneous I apologize but I don't think it takes away from the wider discussion. I saw other sources from US departments and institutions. I personally don't have any sources I know of that are unbiased and I think that's the problem; I don't personally think there should be so much information when we can't truly 100% verify it all. Of course I have no authority here, but it's something that irks me. Oranguru765 (talk) 06:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)