Talk:North Korean famine

Shultz IV's commentary
Because several editors have pointed out the lack of references and obvious bias in the essay by Shultz IV, I've moved his content here for now. I've replaced the article page with content from North Korea, Kim Jong-il, and Famine articles, to serve as a stub.

Shultz IV, please re-add any part of the below after you add references and subtract the commentary. thanks. Appleby 15:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

The North Korean famine of the 1990s started when Kim Il-sung, an amateur in the ways of farming, ordered more rice to be grown in the hills in many parts of North Korea. He also ordered for trees to be cut down in order to give more room to grow rice.

Realizations
Farmers and agricultural specialists who knew better realized immediately that the lack of trees and natural vegetation would allow the rainwaters to progress faster towards the streams & rivers, causing them to receive more than they can take downstream, thus allowing them to overflow their banks! This way, floods would occur and the disaster wouldn't only be that, but also famine resulting from drowning the crops.

However, no one would dare challenge the Great Leader! Whoever thought of challenging him feared getting sent to a re-education camp. (Like the Yodok Concentration Camp, for example.) Therefore, they had no choice but to obey his orders.

The beginning of the disaster
Sure enough, the floods came and the famine started to sweep the nation. However, North Korean media was still forced to lionize the leaders and their accomplishments, and was completely disallowed from reporting negative happenings in their own country. Nevertheless, Kim Il-sung eventually found out about it. He realized that the only way he would save the country is through Reunification. He started the process moving, but in the wee hours of July 8, 1994, he got in an animated argument with Kim Jong-il, and suddenly collapsed due to a heart attack. If it hadn't have been for that (i.e. if Kim Il-sung checked up on his health earlier), Korea may have been reunified today, with millions of lives saved.

The "Arduous March"
Unfortunately, Kim Il-sung's death halted the reunification process and so the famine was allowed to take its course. Flooding was engulfing significant portions of the nation, and so the crops were not allowed to grow. Due to their ideology of "self-reliance", they would not buy food from any neighboring countries nor ask for help in the get-go. As a result, 200,000-1.5 million North Koreans are estimated to have died in what they call the "Arduous March". The Northern provinces of North Korea, that is, North Pyongan, Chagang, Yanggang, and North Hamgyong suffered the most. Pyongyang and all provinces to the south of the capital were spared the brunt of the disaster.

The Call for Disaster Relief
Eventually, they did call the world for disaster relief, and so the Red Cross and the World Food Programme arrived to give assistance. At first, a great portion of the donated food and resources were diverted to their military due to their so called "Military First" policy and the fact that giving them more food & resources would help maintain their loyalty better. However, the aid organizations eventually found out and ensured that the donations only went to where they needed to go.

Aftermath
There was still a shortage of food in some places, and the living conditions worsened as well. Thus, some North Koreans fled the country across the border, often across the Yalu and Tumen Rivers to find more food and a better life. Many stayed in China and even stay in hiding to this day. Many others made the trek to Shenyang and Beijing to South Korean diplomatic compounds to request asylum.

The Communist regime of North Korea is said to have lost the Mandate of Heaven. South Koreans agree, as well as many people around the world. North Koreans may agree also, although they are not free to say so.

WHAT
There was no "aftermath", people, because it didn't end. Actually it is potentially worse than ever!

Sometimes Wikipedia is a total joke. Articles about some unimportant people are longer than the fate of millions right now. --84.234.60.154 (talk) 08:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

"the North estimates its losses at about 2.5 million to 3 million from 1995 to March 1998" 2.5-3 million what? dollars? acres? people? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.14.143.188 (talk) 22:55, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * If the famine never ended, and was worse than ever, by now the population would be virtually extinct.--Jack Upland (talk) 07:38, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

THIS SHOULD BE ONE OF HOTTEST EDITED ARTICLES RIGHT NOW
I can't belive it is TOTALLY IGNORED. --84.234.60.154 (talk) 20:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

To whoever who would make a real article
Pleace use external links I provided while re-writting this joke of an article. --84.234.60.154 (talk) 22:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * It appears you, 84.234.60.154 (talk), are the best editor to improve this article. You are not prevented from doing the text editing and thinking necessary to make the article say what it should. Templates are a form of complaint, not contribution. Just do it. -- Yellowdesk (talk) 02:51, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * This article overlaps partly with Economy of North Korea.--Banana (talk) 22:39, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

No explanation for the term "Arduous March"
I have found no explanation in the article about the meaning of the term "Arduous March". The sentence in Schultz IV' commentary above, "As a result, 200,000-1.5 million North Koreans are estimated to have died in what they call the "Arduous March".", is not very enlightening; why was a famine called a march? --Enaskitis (talk) 09:12, 28 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I've added an explanation and history of the term. Coinmanj (talk) 09:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

march of tribulation
I was redirected from march of tribulation...what does this mean? surely a reason for the redirect? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.122.13.129 (talk) 21:40, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

New sections
In an attempt to shorten the article Economy of North Korea I have moved 2 sections (black market activities and the Public Distribution System) into this article since they deal directly with the famine. The shortened "crisis" section of the Economy article now is more summarized and has a link to this article. Coinmanj (talk) 09:12, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Ongoing starvation as a new section?
Should a new section be made about the recent deaths that have occurred in the past year or so? There isn't mention of the current estimations in the right info box, as far as the article 'North Korean Famine' is concerned, it ended in 1998. The estimation of 10,000-20,000 deaths is pretty steep, I think it merits its own section seeing how when a small plane crashes with 3 people on board it gets its own article. Thoughts? Johnsmithy678 (talk) 02:32, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a good idea to me. bobrayner (talk) 11:16, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd vote for that too.SylviaStanley (talk) 13:17, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The problem is that every so often some media outlet runs a story, with very little evidence, saying, "Famine has returned!", or something like that. The World Food Program, and others who are looking at the situation in the long term, do not say that.--Jack Upland (talk) 07:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * There is also the article at the academic 38north, which says things were confusing this year starting with a drought then rain, causing a "lack [of] clear-cut answers" but in the end his assessment is: "food production is still better than it has been in past years". I didn't think it was clear-cut enough to be a useful source, except perhaps his handy table of FAO data covering 2008-2015. Rwendland (talk) 17:19, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The problem is that a sensationalist claim ends up getting into the article, but a balanced, reasoned analysis doesn't. We also should avoid the fallacy of equating food production with food consumption. Many commentators out-Juche North Korea by presuming that the country should be self-sufficient in food. It doesn't actually have much arable land. You have to look at the economy as a whole. If North Korea expanded its mineral exports (for example), it could import more food etc.--Jack Upland (talk) 23:41, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Desperate eating measures and depletion of coutryside
YouTube videos speak of desperate measures, such as hunting of small animals like frogs and eating plants such as bark or grass. Also video of the countryside shows a ravaged, yellow countryside. It would be enlightening to read discussion of these developments in this article.Dogru144 (talk) 07:51, 19 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Enlightening, or misleading? Here are some photos I took in the summer of 2012:




 * You can see more photos at Environment of North Korea. The photos of a "ravaged" countryside are taken after the winter snow has melted, but before spring regrowth. They are not an accurate representation of what conditions in North Korea are like.--Jack Upland (talk) 07:34, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Fine, but the famine was alleged to have occurred circa 1994-98, not in 2012.


 * The point is that people are saying that these conditions are continuing or worsening.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

This article is starting to sound like rabid western propaganda. Starting with the photos, I bet much of the rest is BS. PS Where are the NASA photos - I am sure they can fill in the missing years on a day by day basis. 2601:181:8301:4510:C046:CE4F:B684:C00E (talk) 03:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Propaganda should be ashamed of itself when it is so stupid. The deaths vary over such a range you know that no one knows the number - many millions to 240,000. US Census can't even count Americans with great reliability and now we are told they can estimate population in countries they can't even visit - sorry but BS. 240,000 deaths over 8 years (30,000 a year) over a population of 22,000,000 gives 30/22,000 or 3/2,200 - I bet this isn't statistically significant. The larger death estimates appear to well within error ranges of any US government numbers of the US much less N Korea. I love BS but this is too stupid to even laugh at. 2601:181:8301:4510:B182:F9B2:4167:1552 (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Estimating deaths from long distance would be very difficult. Even if you could estimate the decline in population, you would have to know how much this was caused by a declining birthrate. In times of hardship, people are likely to put off marriage and children. There is also an issue with the deaths of old people. I read something once about a North Korean who said their mother had died in the Arduous March. But she was in her 70s. No doubt the malnutrition, the hunger, the hardship contributed to her death. But I don't think a death that is a few years "premature" is the same as a death that is decades "premature". The concept of "excess deaths" is a statistical construct that doesn't translate well into ordinary lived experience. I don't know if the North Korean government has ever made a statement on this, but it, and it alone, would be capable of producing meaningful statistics. According to the official statistics, the population was 21 million in 1993 and 24 million in 2008: see Demographics of North Korea. Most people, including the CIA, seem to accept these figures. According to the UN there was a 10% natural increase 1995-2000, which is higher than it is now. But I don't think the real issue was the statistics — which as you say wildly vary — I think the issue is the people's suffering, which the regime in North Korea has acknowledged. Logically speaking, this article should not be "North Korean famine"; it should be "DPRK economic crisis" and talk about the multi-pronged crisis that beset North Korea after natural disasters, loss of trade and aid relations with the Eastern Bloc etc. But, unfortunately, there is a famine of logic.--Jack Upland (talk) 09:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

US/West sanctions against North Korea
Does the sanctions really help the situation? It is pretty clear that the US/West are trying to overthrow the regime by making the situation even worse. They punish the whole population by doing so and put the blame only on the regime while i think that part of the famine however small or big is to blame on US/West politics. I think there should be a section about that. http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2013/10/10/north-korea-sanctions-punish-the-whole-population/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.103.161.92 (talk) 17:41, 25 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The sanctions don't help, but they have a longer-term effect and lifting them wouldn't change anything in the short term. In particular, NK has made a virtue (Juche) of avoiding foreign trade, so it's not like they're waiting to make changes tomorrow.
 * The fundamental issues are:
 * The countries imposing the sanctions are nowhere near NK and not important trading partners anyway. NK cares about trade with China.  (Look at a map; Pyongyang to Beijing is not particularly far.)
 * Everyone knows NK can sell anything it likes to anyone in the world as long as it's marked "made in China" and goes through a Chinese middleman. In other words, NK's poverty isn't as simple as lack of access to markets.
 * Merely allowing trade doesn't change anything as long as North Korea has no money to buy food if it wanted to. Or wants to spend what money it has on Hennessey cognac for dear leader.
 * As long as NK is dependent on donations, it's limited to countries that it hasn't pissed off. That crosses a few off.
 * Possible sources of donations don't trust the NK government to distribute it to the people in need. Unless they're allowed to supervise distribution (which the NK government won't allow), they (justifiably) believe it will be siphoned away by the party and the military.
 * 71.41.210.146 (talk) 02:30, 30 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Sanctions are briefly mentioned in the economy article. That seems an appropriate place, and the information there should be expanded. The sanctions are mainly aimed at the arms industry and luxury goods. This includes the export of arms which has been a major earner of outside revenue. But I haven't seen a good source on the effect on the economy.--Jack Upland (talk) 22:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Floods
This article minimises the impact of the floods (even more so, before I edited it), but most sources say that the floods did have a large impact. (The collapse of the Soviet bloc is also important, of course.) This article mentions economic mismanagement but doesn't explain why this mismanagement would have come to a head in the 1990s.

The citation of Daniel Schwekendiek has been tagged as dubious since 2013. I have located his article, which is based on child height data, and this is the relevant sentence in his conclusion: "Interestingly, the North Korean government's official explanation for the famine—the floods—is not verified here, since the living standards in the previously flood-affected counties were not significantly worse than in the unaffected ones." This assumes that the effect of the floods was localised, which seems to be false. What about flooding of coal mines and damage to hydro-electric dams? The effect of that kind of damage would go across the economy, particularly as it is centralised, and would not necessarily have any impact on the nutrition of nearby children. I will amend the article to reflect what he actually concluded, but I feel the article might be giving undue weight to one study.--Jack Upland (talk) 01:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I have moved information about the immediate flood damage to infrastructure into the "Floods" section. It makes no sense to separate the floods from their immediate impact.--Jack Upland (talk) 01:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Cold
Many deaths were related to the cold in winter, but this isn't mentioned.--Jack Upland (talk) 02:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on North Korean famine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070714092016/http://www.globalpolicy.org///socecon/hunger/relief/2005/0520nkorea.htm to http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/hunger/relief/2005/0520nkorea.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 16:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

1950s
The Background section has two paragraphs about famines in the 1950s (the first one associated with the Korean War). I think this is unnecessary and misleading.--Jack Upland (talk) 00:50, 17 January 2016 (UTC)


 * There being no objections, I've now removed them.--Jack Upland (talk) 03:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Another famine?
According to this, the quotation came from an article entitled "Chosun's Supreme Power", that wasn't translated into English, and the quotation was: "The path to the revolution is never easy, we might have to go through Arduous March again – in which we only had to eat roots of the grass – and we might have to fight against our enemies all by one’s self". It appears to be a passing comment, the implication of which out of keeping with the general thrust of articles published by Rodong Sinmun, which features articles like "Nobody Can Block DPRK's Advance": "High-rise apartment houses will spring up in Ryomyong Street like mushrooms after rain before long through self-reliance and self-development. This represents the mode of the struggle of the Korean people to foil the moves to isolate and stifle the DPRK and bring earlier a rosy future."--Jack Upland (talk) 04:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)


 * According to this — |A Little Story about How the Media Gets North Korea Wrong — the quotation was: "The road of the revolution is long and tough. There may again be times that call for chewing grass roots during an arduous march, and times that call for fighting the enemy single-handedly on a far-flung island…but we have to keep our single-minded loyalty for our dear marshal to the very end even if it costs our lives…". It seems that the reference was only a phrase used in passing. I will remove it from this article.--Jack Upland (talk) 03:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Oh, another fake news about North Korea? Unexpected... emijrp (talk) 10:06, 8 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Exactly.--Jack Upland (talk) 02:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

2002
What is the justification for saying that the famine recommenced in 2002?--Jack Upland (talk) 06:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Since there has been no explanation, I've removed this.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It keeps on being reinstated, but there is no citation, and it is refuted by several reliable sources.--Jack Upland (talk) 03:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Dr. O Grada's comment on this article
Dr. O Grada has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:

"Nobody--repeat, nobody--believes that 3 million died of famine in North Korea in the 1990s. The best guess is probably that by Spoorenberg and Schwekendiek's (cited in fn 7).

Why the 3 million figure became so widely cited is an interesting, separate question. Haggard and Noland, and Becker (all cited here), who gave such a figure credibility as 'regime change' scholars, over-egged the death toll for political reasons. They are given too much respect here.

That there was a crisis and excess mortality is not in doubt. But perhaps the crisis should be seen as a more long-term shift in average mortality than as a famine."

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

Dr. O Grada has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:


 * Reference : Cormac O Grada, 2014. "Fame e Capitale Umano in Inghilterra prima della Rivoluzione Industriale (Hunger and Human Capital in England before the Industrial Revolution)," Working Papers 201403, School of Economics, University College Dublin.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 12:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, there is no relevant, reliable source that we can use.--Jack Upland (talk) 05:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, I doubt it would be that hard to demonstrate the 3 million figure is ignored by most relevant scholars. I mean, even The Black Book of Communism only estimates 500,000 famine-related deaths. When I wrote this a long time ago—and keep in mind that I intended that section to be a strong condemnation of the regime, and I might not do it quite the same way today—I cited the same Population and Development Review source mentioned by O Grada: "Estimates based on the North Korean census suggest that 240,000 to 420,000 people died as a result of the 1990s famine and that there were 600,000 to 850,000 unnatural deaths in North Korea from 1993 to 2008." I'm not saying the 3 million figure should be deleted outright, but it would be more informative (if possible) to explain where it comes from—and that most experts find it implausible—than to merely include it in a broad range and call it a day.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 06:41, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks. This article needs a lot of work. The problem is that editors largely rely on sensational media. As I've said elsewhere, if these kind of reports were true the North Korea population would be extinct.--Jack Upland (talk) 06:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Census data is the result of current pop + births - deaths. Any data on birth rates. If they fall, the census pop slows down. 2601:181:8301:4510:C046:CE4F:B684:C00E (talk) 03:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Current Situation
Hazel Smith comments on the UN Human Rights Report:
 * The narrative of the report presents the view that nothing much has changed since the famine years, that the health and nutritional status of the population is uniquely awful and government policies guilty of breaching the human right to food of the population at large. The data presented above, however, indicates that this picture is erroneous.(p 27)

Given that Smith's view is backed by several authoritative sources, I think the article should be amended to give a more accurate picture of the current situation. I mean that we should tone down references to starvation, cannibalism etc, and rely on long-term research rather than sensationalist reports.--Jack Upland (talk) 03:35, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Read this article for the current situation. How many millions of poor ( not well feed ) kids does the US have? Andrei Lankov is professor of Korean Studies at Kookmin University, Seoul. He is the author of "The Real North Korea: Life and Politics in the Failed Stalinist Utopia".Read 2601:181:8301:4510:C046:CE4F:B684:C00E (talk) 03:21, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


 * I have added Lankov's article to this article.--Jack Upland (talk) 21:49, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Post-famine developments
The following was removed with the edit summary "Citations dont actually say what the poster is claiming":
 * However, the World Food Program has reported malnutrition and food shortages, but not famine. In 2016 UN Committee on the Rights of the Child reported a steady decline in the infant mortality rate since 2008. An academic analysis in 2016 found that the situation had greatly improved since the 1990s and that North Korea's levels of health and nutrition were on par with other developing countries. In 2017, the analyst Andrei Lankov argued that previous predictions of a return to famine were unfounded, and that the days of starvation were long since passed.

This is patently untrue. There are a number of citations there, and, while the wording could be modified, the text does reflect the citations. I reinserted the text, but it was removed again with the edit summary "not a usable citation, removed until a relevant one is provided". The UN, a British academic, and a respected analyst of North Korea are not "usable" or "relevant"?--Jack Upland (talk) 13:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC)


 * There being no response, I have restored the text.--Jack Upland (talk) 10:10, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi User:Jack Upland, Thank you for following up the critical issue for the human right. I believe that you have a warm heart for the people in DPRK Goodtiming8871 (talk) 02:48, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Does North Korea actually claim millions died from famine in the mid-90's?
I am skeptical of claims by the article according to which North Korea claims millions died in the famine (see [Estimated number of deaths]). I have searched extensively through North Korean media and web sites and can find no such evidence anywhere in sight. One of the articles cited (see World: Asia-Pacific North Korea 'loses 3 million to famine') gives "North Korean" statistics which were in fact provided by Yonhap (linked to South Korean intelligence and never a reliable source for information on North Korea). I would like to remove this from the article as this is most likely a misquote/distortion by South Korean intelligence. If North Korea has ever claimed anything remotely similar to this, please say where to find it (outside of quotations by Yonhap). There doesn't appear to be a single webpage from North Korea which discusses the alleged mid-to-late 1990's famine (let alone any with figures that inflated).

Philippe Biberson, president of Médecins sans frontières (Doctors Without Borders), said in 1998 that "we don't have any medical data on this country [North Korea], that's why these studies extrapolating from figures taken on a reduced scale are dishonest" and that "in the places I've visited, I do not believe the people die from hunger." (see Corée du Nord: la famine «manipulée»Le président de MSF déplore l'opacité et les contraintes qui entourent la lutte contre la disette. - French original: "On n'a aucune information médicale sur ce pays, c'est pourquoi ces études extrapolant à partir de chiffres pris sur un échantillon réduit sont malhonnêtes" and, also, "Dans les endroits que j'ai visités, je ne pense pas que les gens meurent de faim."). I would like to quote this in the article, but I'm not sure exactly how to do it because it's originally in French - would I simply quote the translation, or provide the original text with it?

Also, another point: the source provided for the claim "Roughly 45% of North Korean children under the age of five are stunted from malnutrition and the population of kotjebi persists." does not actually state 45% of children are stunted, and is sensationalist reporting about young supposed "defectors" whom Laos and North Korea say were actually victims of human trafficking who may have been beaten and forced to convert to Christianity. I have removed it from the article as the citation only discusses "kotjebi" and not the _supposed_ 45% of North Korean children (and what about homeless populations and malnourished children in the developed countries of the world, much richer in terms of average GDP than North Korea - in the United States, just for one example, over 12 million children are food insecure - which amounts to one in six children, if we count children as anyone under 18 - that is "economic mismanagement"). The article also has other claims that I plan to follow up at some point. Incogreader (talk • contribs) 17:36, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * "There doesn't appear to be a single webpage from North Korea which discusses the alleged mid-to-late 1990's famine"...well, if there was a free press in North Korea, and if we could trust their government to speak the truth, that would be something. You can cite in French and/or translate it, that's not a problem--but you would do well to provide proper context for it and attribute the opinion. Liberation is a reliable source, but this is an opinion. A quick Google Books search provides plenty of reliable sources whose content deserves attention:, , , . Drmies (talk) 18:03, 17 June 2019 (UTC)


 * I have removed the phrase "as claimed by the North Korean government". I can't see that the cited source says that.--Jack Upland (talk) 20:58, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * While the press in Western countries is controlled mostly by a handful of millionaires/billionaires (with some state owned such as BBC) as opposed to mostly state-owned, this does not mean that their reports are accurate. Almost all of the sources you cite are defectors, who tend to be notoriously unreliable (Iraqi defectors having helped sell lies to willing ears about weapons of mass destruction). Beyond that, these people are writing about their supposed personal experiences, you can't generalize numbers from that with any accuracy. Although the change by Jack Upland is welcomed, there is still a problem with this line "A survey by North Korea's Public Security Ministry suggests that 2,500,000 to 3,000,000 people died from 1995 to March 1998, although the numbers may have been inflated in order to secure additional food aid". The source that this uses, World: Asia-Pacific North Korea 'loses 3 million to famine'), quotes Yonhap (who allegedly bases this on North Korean data, but I question this, having found nothing of the sort). Yonhap is effectively South Korean intelligence propaganda (see its Wikipedia page), and I question its reliability. As I said, I have been able to find no such study or any discussion of famine in North Korean media and web sites. I thus also don't believe a survey with such a figure actually exists. If the only source is Yonhap, my suggestion is this should be deleted. I would like to know what others think of deleting it.


 * As far as whether or not there was actually a widespread famine at one point in the mid-90's at all, I'm not saying that it's completely impossible that there was hunger to some unknown extent, as it is known that there were multiple natural disasters, I was just raising questions, based on the experience of the president of one major NGO (whose honesty and criticisms on the matter are commendable and a breath fresh air from the uncritical acceptance of seemingly absurdly high estimates - one of the upper ones being based on a study of a small sample of defectors, as per the article Libération).
 * The BBC report does not exactly endorse Yonhap's report: "Correspondents say if the statistics are correct as reported by the South Korean news agency Yonhap, aid agencies fear that previous drought and floods have left the country in a far worse situation than previously thought". Nor does it say the North might have been inflating the numbers. It also suggests the population loss might be partly due to migration. It also quotes "Figures provided to the UN Development Program by the North" which purport to show the population grew over that period. I don't see anything wrong with citing the BBC report, but there are nuances in it that should be noted.--Jack Upland (talk) 04:29, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * It also contradicts the start of the section which says that the North Korean government hasn't released this information.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:28, 18 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Overall, I don't think this section is well supported by citations. The first paragraph has two citations, neither of which properly support the first sentence. The estimate of 800,000 to 1.5 million deaths is not supported by the sources. Courtland-Robinson et al don't give an estimate as far as I can see. Goodkind and West give an estimate of 600,000 to 1 million. The next paragraph talks about "Haggard and Noland", and gives a range of 220,000 to 4 million, but actually cites Natsios who gives a figure of 2-3 million. The third paragraph cites this dubious North Korean report and then cites Haggard and Noland. The fourth paragraph is irrelevant. The fifth paragraph has an incomplete citation.The last paragraph looks OK. I think this section needs a complete revamp, based on what sources say, and organised in a logical way.--Jack Upland (talk) 09:02, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * After reviewing the above, I agree that the rest of the section needs to be redone as well, and organized in much a better way. For what its worth, the article in Libération states that estimates of deaths since 1995 "go from some hundreds [sic] to 1, 2, or even 3 million." I will try to find estimates on this lower end of the scale, but they are most likely buried. I also question that "economic mismanagement" somehow caused famine, since I've not seen anything similar ever reported before in the DPRK/North Korea's history when the economy was managed similarly. Supposedly wealthy countries like the US that have disgraceful records of food insecurity (as noted, including at least 1 in 6 children) are "mismanaged." Incogreader 18/6/2019
 * Yeah, I agree the mismanagement claim is strange. The North's economy was ahead of the South's up to the 1970s.--Jack Upland (talk) 20:52, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Thus, barring the possibility of deaths after March 1997 (the alleged famine is said to have been worst in 1997, so this is possible), wouldn't it be more correct to say that North Korea referred to the period of economic difficulty and food shortage as the Arduous March, rather than the "famine" which, according to North Korea seems to be (again, unless they reported such deaths after March 1997) that it never actually happened as claimed, although there was food shortage and things were difficult (backing anecdotal accounts by Biberson of Doctors Without Borders/MSF that he didn't "think that the people die from hunger" in the places he visited, or, the one of Michel Tailhedes, a doctor with the International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, who said in 1998 "We've never seen people die from hunger. All we have seen are cases of chronic malnutrition." (French original: «On n'a jamais vu de gens mourir de faim. Tout ce qu'on a pu constater, ce sont des cas de malnutrition chronique» - see La difficulté d'enquêter.)  Incogreader (talk  22 June 2019  —Preceding undated comment added 03:52, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * My next question, is it accurate to say that North Korea refers to the famine as the Arduous March, as the article suggests? It seems to be the official position of the DPRK/North Korea (I assume Pyongyang Times is official) that there was food shortage caused by natural disasters (see Defending socialism by dint of Songun, laying foundation for socialist power building, which does indeed refer to the period of food shortage as Arduous March), but I've never actually seen anything from North Korea that there was famine as such, as noted above. Indeed, the North Korean diplomat referred to in Irish Times now quoted in the intro of the article as I edited it said that reports of "hundreds" of deaths from starvation in March 1997 were incorrect, although the situation was "difficult."
 * I think there are a number of questions there. Generally speaking in famines, people die of hunger-related illness rather than simply dying of hunger. In North Korea, we are looking at deaths during winter, which may be as due to cold as to hunger. Also, these are "excess deaths", deaths over and above the normal death rate. This includes the deaths of elderly people, who might have died a few years earlier than they would have done. I don't understand the point you are making about March 1997. In regards to the "Arduous March", this is a term relating to the period of hardship in general, not just to food shortages. I think this is made fairly clear in the article, but maybe it is inappropriate to treat the terms "Arduous March" and "North Korean famine" as synonyms, as they really quite different. I have felt for a long time that this article should not be called the "North Korean famine" but instead the "North Korean economic crisis", because what happened was far broader than a food shortage.--Jack Upland (talk) 07:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I would agree with renaming the article "North Korean economic crisis." Also, there are problems with the methodology of the estimates, for example Goodkind and West take estimated deaths from the Great Leap Forward _in China_ and extrapolate that to North Korea. Robinson et al. take estimated deaths in one region and extrapolate that to the whole country as an upper limit. Natsios admits that "these assessments [about famine] were disputed by independent observers (Flake 1997). " (p. 5, http://www.usip.org/files/resources/sr990802.pdf) The methodology Natsios uses to come up with the estimate of "2-3 million" is unclear, but seems to be based on defectors, who as I've noted before tend to be unreliable. The figures are misleading - for example, as Jack Upland notes, they include the deaths of the elderly who might have, for example, died at 64 rather than 70, and in cases where there are estimates of infant mortality, these are not based on actual figures for that but are instead extrapolated based on one study of child nutrition. And even if the life expectancy declined in North Korea in the 1990s as some sources say, at the time it was still at least seven years higher than Cambodia (which has a similar or slightly higher GDP), two years higher than India (which has a higher GDP) and exceeded that of Russia by two years (against a significantly higher GDP) in 1995, so it is deceptive to call that "famine" - there is no article about the Indian famine, or Cambodian famine. Life expectancy was also still considerably higher than it was in 1948, when the DPRK was first established (and is now nearly double).
 * The supposed reductions are based on North Korea's own standards - though by all accounts life expectancy in the mid-1990s was still higher than some Asian countries with similar or higher GDPs, there is no article about the Indian famine, for example. Also, it appears that most of the estimates do not consider migration, which the article places at 250,000 (there is no reference for this figure given, but it could be expected that in times of food shortage migration would increase - for example, during the Irish famine more than 10% of the population left). There is no source given for the claim that "North Korean officials have put the figures as low as 250,000 in confidential discussions," so I will remove this line. My point with the Arduous March was that North Korea itself seems to suggest that although there was food shortage, there was no generalized famine (I found a quote from a North Korean official from March 1997 to that effect - my point was that unless North Korea reported deaths after that, its position appeared to be that Western reports of "hundreds of deaths from hunger" are incorrect). Incogreader (talk) 21:15, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, but bear in mind these inaccuracies and estimates are normal when calculating famines.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:52, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Life expectancy in North Korea was higher in Cambodia and India during the mid-1990s
First of all, I don't understand why this was removed:

"However, life expectancy in North Korea in the mid-1990's during the worst years of the food shortage was still at least seven years higher than Cambodia (a country with a similar or slightly higher gross domestic product than North Korea) and at least two years higher than India (which has a higher GDP) "

It was a synthesis of life expectancy data reported by Wikipedia (also including data from Google listing life expectancy on those pages). I believe this is worth stating, although one user complained about it, and reported to administrators.Incogreader (talk) 03:25, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

== Did the famine (which bagan in 1994) bagan before Kim Il-sung's death (July 1994) and if yes, what was his reaction to it? ==

Hi, I'm tagging you cuz quite a time passed since I added this topic and no one answered. I'll be grateful if you've got some info. Thanks in advance. Ентусиастъ/Entusiast (talk) 10:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm wondering the same. Statskvinde (talk) 17:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

re:Black markets
The only cited source [62] is a Korean Times article, who doesn't list his own sources.

"Most factories in North Korea are non-functioning" is a strong statement, one reporter's offhand comment is insufficient evidence for this claim. The wage amounts also need to be sourced. Listiip (talk) 06:24, 2 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @Listiip There is a system of bribes in NK but black market is non-existent as everything is controlled by the state. Statskvinde (talk) 18:00, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * that is not true. There is even a term for it: Jangmadang. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:42, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * @Finnusertop Lol, ok. Keep coping boyo. Statskvinde (talk) 19:39, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Percentages Not clear
At several points in the article percentages are stated without it being made clear precisely what they are referring to. For instance, women in the workforce is given a percentage of 89%, but it is not clear whether this means that 89% of the workforce is composed of women or 89% of women are members of the workforce. At another point child malnutrition is stated as being at 3%. What does this mean? The 3% of children suffer malnutrition? Surely that figure is higher. Prbedard (talk) 02:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Is North Korea soon no longer a nation
Is North Korea no longer a nation soon 2001:4455:69B:900:B8BF:F1D6:B330:F89E (talk) 03:06, 18 December 2023 (UTC)