Talk:Northern Sámi

QUESTION
I'm not very good at editing but I stuck a link at the top of the page. I think it would be a good idea to put that instead of the video of Sámegiella speakers that is already there. The video I inserted I believe better represents traditional Sámi, as the other one has a LOT (I am aware there is differing opinions on this but) of what I consider kind of made up words like that were just invented recently like a word for "technology" etc. This one also features more traditional Sámi culture which is a good insight to go along with the language page. There are subtitles available in Swedish Norwegian English and about 10 more. 98.3.103.238 (talk) 16:18, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Untitled
I am writing the grammar section of Northern Sami. Native speakers, please check my spelling of Sami words and correct possible grammatical errors. In future I am planning to add adjectives, tenses, moods, voices etc. Arteum — Preceding undated comment added 05:47, 10 September 2005 (UTC)


 * There are no possessive pronouns in Northern Sami. The listed ones are genitive forms of the personal pronouns. --Hippophaë 17:50, 10 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Yes, I agree, Hippophaë, but I think it is understood that a possessive pronoun by definition is a personal pronoun in the genetive case. Arteum — Preceding undated comment added 20:49, 13 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Possessive pronouns or personal pronouns in genitive are just differences in terms. Northern Sami does have, however, "posessive suffixes" for nouns, if it helps at all.  I'd help out the effort by writing more here on grammar, but I have to learn decent wiki-coding skills first. ;)  --Alcarilinque 09:36, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * No, it's not a difference of terms. Possessive pronouns are different pronouns from the normal pronouns, while pronouns in the genitive are regularly agglutinated. Consider "I &mdash; my", "mu- &mdash; mu". --Vuo 14:09, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

As Vuo says, Northern Sámi does not have any possessive pronouns, it uses the genitive case of pronouns to accomplish the same thing. These are, however, two distinct linguistic phenomena. -Yupik 11:21, 21 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Being a native Finnish speaker, I disagreed with this: "and as Ŋ (engma) is not just an allophone of N as in Finnish, it needs a separate letter." Sometimes it's an allophone, but sometimes it's a different phoneme in Finnish, as well. "langan" /lɑŋŋɑn/ = wire (genitive case); "lannan" /lɑnnɑn/ = dung (genitive case). So I edited that part a little. Now it sounds stupid, so maybe someone is interested in writing it in fluent English. -anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.230.27.24 (talk) 12:05, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Please, anyone could write any word that it contains 'ŋ' in sami. Perhaps I cant understand why is wrong the sentence that reduced the anonymous. It was: " Sometimes it's an allophone, but sometimes it's a different phoneme in Finnish, as well." The samples that fournished himself confirm that he dislikes, it is unreasonable!
 * Pasqual (ca) 22:44, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Langan is a form of lanka, where [ŋ] is clearly an allophone of N. In Finnish, this is always the case for /ŋ/; it never occurs independently of /k/, whether or not /k/ is actually pronounced. In Sami languages, /nn/ and /ŋŋ/ can differentiate unrelated roots. --Vuo 23:10, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I think that it is simpler, I would write something like: "The velar nasal is transcripted with Ŋ, this sound can be also an allophone of /n/ when precedes /k/ and /g/." Because the reference of Finnish doesn't appears before this sentence and it makes dificult the understanding, why does the text speak about Finnish? Because it is a knowner language?
 * Pasqual's talk (ca) 18:41, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

I just did several changes, with bearings on the ongoing discussion: There are no possessive pronouns in Sámi, and the statement on ŋ (both in Finnish (cf. the word sangen and in Sámi (the word ''maŋŋel)) was just misleading. The only special thing about ŋ is that it cannot occur syllable-initially, and that it must be long (the last only in Finnish). Terminology: Locative has been standard since after Nielsen's grammar. Abessive: Not in the nominal paradigm. Trondtr 23:26, 8 April 2006 (UTC).

Pronoun table changes
Thought I'd make a note of this in discussion incase anyone had something to say. Genitive and Accusative don't really diverge in personal pronouns, and generally in the literature concerning Sámi are treated separately. As for Inessive-Elative, I haven't really seen that term used though it makes complete sense. On the other hand, the literature I've got just refers to it as locative. --Ryan 11:44, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Ŧ
How does a handwritten Ŧ look? How do you differentiate Ŧ and F in handwriting? Thanks! 85.176.188.161 (talk) 18:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I doubt there are enough minimal pairs to create particular confusion. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 00:00, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Imperative of negative verb
The current table only gives the you-forms (ale, alli, allet) but there are also I-forms and he/she-forms of the negative verb in its imperative form: I don't know how to put it into the table, but it's: 1sg allon 3sg allos 1du allu 3du alloska 1pl allot 3pl alloset ...it may have been left out due to the assumption that there would be no imperative form referring to oneself or a third person, but Sámi has a function for it: self-referring imperative makes it a suggestion ("let's not stop here"), and third-person-referring makes it an expression of a desire ("may he never find out!") —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.156.29.205 (talk) 14:13, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * actually, the conjugation is identical to the one marked "optative" except that optative has allom instead of allon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.156.29.205 (talk) 14:16, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * scratch that, I just found out what "optative" is... I guess it covers the meaning of 1-person and 3-person imperative in Sámi. But when learning Sámi, one is taught all these nine forms of the negative verb as "imperative forms" rather than two separate but identical forms...
 * Also, what's up with the "m" in the first form? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.156.29.205 (talk) 14:19, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Vibrancy / Decline
This is a question to editors more familiar with the situation than myself: Is there any data on the language's present status among the younger generations? Is it generally being passed on to children, are there enough schools to ensure education in North Sami, etc. Is there a government effort to support the language? Trigaranus (talk) 16:21, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Early Sami text
I recently transcribed a Swedish-Sami book that appears to be in Northern Sami. It was out of scope for Swedish Wikisouce, so I duplicated the entire book at the common Wikisource site and placed the Sami part here.

This title is described in the article "History".

Peter Isotalo 20:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I can't really make much sense of it in this old orthography. Is there a modern version available, or could it perhaps be rewritten? CodeCat (talk) 21:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Given that the book is from Sweden, this is likely old Lule Sami rather than Northern Sami; as might be suggested by e.g. åå for *oa (as in pååtedh 'to come'). In theory it could be also Ume Sami, for which several religious writings from the 17th century are known (but I can't seem to notice any positive characteristics of it just now, and at least mubbe 'second' is clearly a Northwestern Sami form). As far as I know, there are no written Northern Sami materials from before the 18th century. -- Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 19:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I noticed a few instances of "uä" too, is that also consistent with Lule or Ume? CodeCat (talk) 20:03, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * On checking: per Korhonen this is actually southern Torne Sami, so within the modern perimeter of Northern Sami. -- Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 18:00, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Frontness distinctions in open vowels
The article by Bals, Odden and Rice suggests that in the Kautokeino dialect, there is a distinction between long and, although the latter apparently only occurs in a few environments. Sammallahti on the other hand doesn't make this distinction, and posits only a single. Ignoring the complications of eastern Finnmark, what is the situation for the rest of the Northern Sami varieties? Do they have a distinction in frontness between a and á, or is it one of length alone? What happens in environments where a lengthens or á shortens, is there a merger? Rua (mew) 11:32, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hmm. Per Sammallahti Eastern Enontekiö has no quality distinction, and his dialect samples in The Saami Languages don't have anything of the sort for Kautokeino dialect or the other Torne group dialects either. I'm used to seeing a description of á(= older a) as "light" (heleä) versus a (= older â) as "dark" (tumma), but the impression I'm getting by now is that this might be a purely Finnish convention, due to how most NS speakers in Finland speak the Eastern Finnmark dialect(s).
 * Korhonen in Johdatus… gives á as qualitatively [a] ~ [a͕] in the western dialects (= IPA ~ ), a as [a] (= IPA ), but without any comments on what environments you'd find [a͕] in. -- Trɔpʏliʊm  • blah 17:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Cluster tk
How is the cluster tk realised in Northern Sami? I've seen some hints that the first member may actually be a fricative, so ŧk, but I don't know if that's accurate for all dialects or even for any of them. If the first member is a stop in some dialects, is it still lengthened in the strong grade like in other consonant clusters? Rua (mew) 00:22, 14 November 2017 (UTC)


 * I added info about this to the consonants section. ArcticSeeress (talk) 23:20, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

d between unstressed vowels
I found one source that gives, in passing without giving it any thought, the pronunciation of "olbmot mannet vuojadit geassit" as /olpmoh manneh vuojaðih keassiih(t)/. The intervocalic d of vuojadit is apparently transcribed with a fricative /ð/. Is this the normal pronunciation in this environment? I've never seen it mentioned in any sources beside this one (and this can hardly be considered a mention). Rua (mew) 21:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)


 * I have added this now. It only took six years, but better late than never. ArcticSeeress (talk) 23:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Northern Sami. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090120081140/http://www.eng.samer.se/servlet/GetDoc?meta_id=1186 to http://www.eng.samer.se/servlet/GetDoc?meta_id=1186
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110822024405/http://giellatekno.uit.no/english.html to http://giellatekno.uit.no/english.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:33, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kildin Sami orthography which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:03, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Northern Sami noun cases
I would like to know which sources the user Rua uses when he states that -i, for example, is always the illative ending. This is obviosuly not always the case. An noun ending with a will have this letter removed and changed into -ii. A noun ending with -i will have it changed into -ái. I tried to put this information in the article, but had it removed. Also, -is is sometimes the locative ending (not always just -s). 83.226.235.204 (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * As you can see in the article, the table of endings gives a general overview of the endings, stating that the actual forms can differ in details. These details are not included in the table because 1. they'd just clutter up the table and make it less neat and 2. they're shown down below for actual nouns. The section "Post-stressed vowel alternations" deals with the changes in stem vowels and thus shouldn't be repeated in a general overview of the endings, again because it would add unnecessary clutter. Also, what makes you assume I'm male? Rua (mew) 22:33, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

This article is way too long...
...and should be chopped up into smaller, more manageable bits. It takes forever to load on slow connections. For example, most of the grammar parts could be moved to Northern Sami grammar, much like we have Finnish grammar as a spin-off of the Finnish language article, etc. -Yupik (talk) 02:15, 10 June 2019 (UTC)


 * I agree that the page is far too large. I'll think about creating a separate article on the grammar once I've verified everything here; I'd rather not move a whole bunch of unverified material onto a new page. ArcticSeeress (talk) 23:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

IPA transcription for 'davvisámegiella'
Why is the IPA transcription for 'davvisámigiella' '/ˈtav.viː.ˌsaː.me.ˌkie̯l.la/'? I originally added it as '[davvisaːmegie̯lla]' and then corrected me. I'm not saying they're wrong, I just don't quite understand. Logan Sherwin (talk) 19:45, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * That's just how it's pronounced, isn't it? Why is anything pronounced the way it is? Rua (mew) 20:28, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, for some reason I thought that in the current orthography 'd' always correspded to [d] and 'g' always corresponded to [g]. Now that I'm reading more about the orthography (and phonology) I understand. Sorry about that! :) Also, I'm kinda new to talk pages, and I'm not sure whether or not I delete this section now that the discussion topic it resolved. Should I? Logan Sherwin (talk) 20:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)