Talk:Northern line extension to Battersea/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 14:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I'm happy to review this article. I'll be using the template below. If you have any questions as we go, you can just ask here or on my talk page, either's fine! —Ganesha811 (talk) 14:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)


 * , feel free to address the issues described below while I dive into prose and comprehensiveness. We should be able to get this to GA together! :) —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * @Ganesha811 Will do, thanks! Turini2 (talk) 20:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, do you still have time available to respond to comments/suggestions right now? Noticed you haven't made any changes since the 23rd. If you are busy IRL or otherwise, just let me know and I can put the review on hold for a couple of weeks to allow time for changes to be made. —Ganesha811 (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry - I need a few dedicated hours to plough though this, and I was busy last weekend. Shall I ping you around the 13th February? Thanks again for your help in this. Turini2 (talk) 14:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I'll put it on hold for a week and check back in after that! No rush. Ping me when you're done with these suggestions or if you have any questions. —Ganesha811 (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi ! I see 10mmsocket has made some improvements in the prior week, but almost all of the comments below are still unaddressed. Will you have time in the near future to work on this article again? —Ganesha811 (talk) 03:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I have time this evening, so I'll get started! Turini2 (talk) 16:48, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Will come back to this tomorrow - have started with a load of references Turini2 (talk) 22:16, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * , thanks for the reference work. A lot of issues are still unaddressed. Would another week on hold to allow you time to make changes be helpful? —Ganesha811 (talk) 11:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I think so, yes! Turini2 (talk) 13:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Alright, let's give it a week and reassess after the 25th. I'd like to wrap the review up shortly after that if possible. When these comments are addressed the only thing left will be prose, which I generally handle directly to save us both time. —Ganesha811 (talk) 13:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Reopening review - some improvements have been made, but after another week on hold the issues below have not yet been fully addressed. The article was last edited on the 16th. , please see if you can get to them in the next few days (before the 28th) or I'll have to close out this review. Thanks. —Ganesha811 (talk) 00:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Okay, have made some edits tonight - I'm free tomorrow, so should have time to finish these bits then. On the homestretch! Turini2 (talk) 22:11, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Great, I'll take a look at it tomorrow night. Thanks! —Ganesha811 (talk) 22:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * , your last edit summary indicated you planned to continue working on the lead/elsewhere. Are you continuing to make changes or should I take another look now? It'd be great to wrap up this review expeditiously. —Ganesha811 (talk) 06:08, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Have made the final few changes I think - cutting out a little excess detail here and there. Not sure about the use of bullets in the Initial route consultation (2010) section - but it's clearer to read, regarding the various options. Let me know your thoughts. Turini2 (talk) 23:13, 1 March 2023 (UTC)


 * This article meets the GA standard! Congrats to and all those editors who worked on it. —Ganesha811 (talk) 02:21, 2 March 2023 (UTC)