Talk:Northwest Biotherapeutics

Fair use rationale for Image:Northwest Biotherapeutics.gif
Image:Northwest Biotherapeutics.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Therapy "difference"?
From the DCVax-Prostate section: "This method is very different..." Different from what—NB's other therapies, existing prostate therapy, or both? I can't help wondering, as I live in the suburbs and don't have a whole lot more to do. – AndyFielding (talk) 09:37, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Removal of content and issues with article
I have just deleted the sections DCVax-Prostate and Production efficiency as these were to me obviously in violation of WP:PROMOTION in particular but also WP:V. The article in general is not completely in line with WP:NPOV, but I think a lot of it may be salvageable, while the two sections mentioned above seemed hopeless. The article similarly continues to lack a lot of citations. Stowgull (talk) 19:19, 16 September 2022 (UTC)